TLPTPW #35 dyscalculic bugs edition

Jonathan
Jonathan
Joined: 27 Oct 16
Posts: 1179
Credit: 1807271
RAC: 0

Winning, but then as a

Winning, but then as a dyslexic bug?

mikey
mikey
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 12865
Credit: 1884358953
RAC: 234512

Jonathan_76 wrote:Winning,

Jonathan_76 wrote:
Winning, but then as a dyslexic bug?

Well you were winning anyway!!

RandyC
RandyC
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 6763
Credit: 111139797
RAC: 0

WINNING on a nice cool Sunday

WINNING on a nice cool Sunday morning (63F).

Seti Classic Final Total: 11446 WU.

Jonathan
Jonathan
Joined: 27 Oct 16
Posts: 1179
Credit: 1807271
RAC: 0

I am not dyslexic yet, not do

I am not dyslexic yet, not do I have any idea as to what that could have to do with a bug.

That is, I don't know any bugs that write.

In software development you can create a bug by typing something dyslectic, though I somehow doubt that is what was meant.

Chris S
Chris S
Joined: 27 Aug 05
Posts: 2469
Credit: 19550265
RAC: 0

We know some people do not

 

We know some people do not have English as their first language, so in an attempt to be helpful.

 

You may notice I've updated the thread title (twice, actually). The new title is a clue, but a pretty vague one

Dyslexia = word blindness

Programming bug = a typographical mistake that makes a program behave in way it wasn't designed to.

satire = parody, burlesque, caricature, lampoon

irony = sarcasm, dryness, sharpness, acerbity, cynicism

 

kids_draw_board_free_246.png

 

Waiting for Godot & salvation :-)

Why do doctors have to practice?
You'd think they'd have got it right by now

Jonathan
Jonathan
Joined: 27 Oct 16
Posts: 1179
Credit: 1807271
RAC: 0

Regarding dyslexia: There is

Regarding dyslexia:

There is some variability in the definition of dyslexia. Some sources, such as the U.S. National Institutes of Health, define it specifically as a learning disorder.[2] Other sources, however, define it simply as an inability to read in the context of normal intelligence, and distinguish between developmental dyslexia (a learning disorder) and acquired dyslexia (loss of the ability to read caused by brain damage). ICD 10, the manual of medical diagnosis used in much of the world, includes separate diagnoses for "developmental dyslexia" (81.0)[21] and for "dyslexia and alexia" (48.0).[22] DSM 5, the manual of psychiatric diagnosis used in the United States, does not specifically define dyslexia, justifying this decision by stating that "the many definitions of dyslexia and dyscalculia meant those terms would not be useful as disorder names or in the diagnostic criteria". Instead it includes dyslexia in a category called specific learning disorders.[23]

According to some this is just rubbish though (source wikipedia).

Chris S
Chris S
Joined: 27 Aug 05
Posts: 2469
Credit: 19550265
RAC: 0

As I said earlier, Wikipedia

As I said earlier, Wikipedia is a useful starter for ten, which will give links to other works of reference for further reading, as you have highlighted in your post. It is not to be taken as gospel. Yes, there is Dyslexia, Alexia, and Dyscalculia, which are all linked in developmental disorders.

 

 

Waiting for Godot & salvation :-)

Why do doctors have to practice?
You'd think they'd have got it right by now

mikey
mikey
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 12865
Credit: 1884358953
RAC: 234512

Chris S_2 wrote:As I said

Chris S_2 wrote:
As I said earlier, Wikipedia is a useful starter for ten, which will give links to other works of reference for further reading, as you have highlighted in your post. It is not to be taken as gospel. Yes, there is Dyslexia, Alexia, and Dyscalculia, which are all linked in developmental disorders.  

I thought Dyslexia had to do with the inability to figure out words because the brain rearranged them? So while most people can figure this little ditty out:

"Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteers be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."

Chances are you also understand it. It purports that the order of the letters inside a given word doesn't matter, as long as the first and last letters of each word are in the right place."

Dyslexia folks could not.

Gary Charpentier
Gary Charpentier
Joined: 13 Jun 06
Posts: 2109
Credit: 108214225
RAC: 17353

Funny I thought that dyslexia

Funny I thought that dyslexia was on the outbound side, where the letters got jumbled.

 

Chris S
Chris S
Joined: 27 Aug 05
Posts: 2469
Credit: 19550265
RAC: 0

I am not a medical person so

I am not a medical person so I do not have the knowledge to describe Dyslexia properly. All I know is that it is known generally as Word Blindness, both in reading and writing. I do recall reading that having a yellow coloured overlay makes it easier to read for Dyslexic people. I think I'll leave anything more to Dr Mike.

 

 

Waiting for Godot & salvation :-)

Why do doctors have to practice?
You'd think they'd have got it right by now

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.