well igave it a chance, but its no good for me.
the latest problem.
27/07/2005 10:22:49|Einstein@Home|Restarting result H1_0501.0__0501.4_0.1_T28_Fin1_2 using einstein version 0.03
27/07/2005 10:22:49|SETI@home|Restarting result 03my04ab.1049.6818.342332.250_3 using setiathome version 4.18
Seti and Einstein both running at the same time now.
I am going to delete the file and try again later.
but will keep an eye on this thread just incase there is another fix underway.
good luck.
since removing the .xml file boinc has been requesting 0 seconds works?
i have the old 4.79 files in a back-up copy i made prior to the test.
should i try and place them back and see what happens?
cheers
j
since removing the .xml file boinc has been requesting 0 seconds works?
i have the old 4.79 files in a back-up copy i made prior to the test.
should i try and place them back and see what happens?
cheers
j
just to let you know, got some work now on 4.79.
seems to be back to normal.
Seti and Einstein both running at the same time now.
I am going to delete the file and try again later.
but will keep an eye on this thread just incase there is another fix underway.
good luck.
This has been a reported occurance on BOINC. It's not an issue with the new E@H science app, it's a BOINC thing.
Only running one machine on the 0.03 test application -- Celeron 1.0gig with 524meg memory, WindowsME for OS and an nVidia TNT M64 video card ... using the "run always" option in BOINC Manager.
Three more Wus are completed, and the numbers are remaining relatively constant (two WUs in the high 81,000 bracket, and one in the mid 82,000 bracket.
Bottom line here, unless a recompilation is performed, resulting in much reduced times for the 'CPU-impared', these old 1.0gig PIII Celerons will only get one WU/day (or thereabouts). The visuals and screensaver work well, but I do have other things to do besides sit around and watch the pretty pictures....
003 has been crunching 2 wu's in HT mode here just fine for 2 hours and it looks like each will take 13 hours. My previous wu's have a range of 10.5 to 12 hours. Also the screensaver is back on my ATI 9800Pro using the 5.6 driver. ;)
well igave it a chance, but
)
well igave it a chance, but its no good for me.
the latest problem.
27/07/2005 10:22:49|Einstein@Home|Restarting result H1_0501.0__0501.4_0.1_T28_Fin1_2 using einstein version 0.03
27/07/2005 10:22:49|SETI@home|Restarting result 03my04ab.1049.6818.342332.250_3 using setiathome version 4.18
Seti and Einstein both running at the same time now.
I am going to delete the file and try again later.
but will keep an eye on this thread just incase there is another fix underway.
good luck.
RE: Seti and Einstein both
)
Which client version are you using?
BM
BM
BOINC client 4.45 since
)
BOINC client 4.45
since removing the .xml file boinc has been requesting 0 seconds works?
i have the old 4.79 files in a back-up copy i made prior to the test.
should i try and place them back and see what happens?
cheers
j
RE: BOINC client
)
just to let you know, got some work now on 4.79.
seems to be back to normal.
RE: Seti and Einstein both
)
This has been a reported occurance on BOINC. It's not an issue with the new E@H science app, it's a BOINC thing.
i have completed about 4
)
i have completed about 4 units or so now. All looking to be about 1200 secs slower on my 3.4Ghz P4 Prescott.
Only running one machine on
)
Only running one machine on the 0.03 test application -- Celeron 1.0gig with 524meg memory, WindowsME for OS and an nVidia TNT M64 video card ... using the "run always" option in BOINC Manager.
Three more Wus are completed, and the numbers are remaining relatively constant (two WUs in the high 81,000 bracket, and one in the mid 82,000 bracket.
Bottom line here, unless a recompilation is performed, resulting in much reduced times for the 'CPU-impared', these old 1.0gig PIII Celerons will only get one WU/day (or thereabouts). The visuals and screensaver work well, but I do have other things to do besides sit around and watch the pretty pictures....
If I've lived this long - I gotta be that old!
On my Pentium M 1.73 Ghz
)
On my Pentium M 1.73 Ghz laptop the each run is about 1000 seconds slower on the 0.03 application.
Ahhh...if it's all the same
)
Ahhh...if it's all the same with you I'll stay with what works till your sure you got the bugs out.
Greg
003 has been crunching 2 wu's
)
003 has been crunching 2 wu's in HT mode here just fine for 2 hours and it looks like each will take 13 hours. My previous wu's have a range of 10.5 to 12 hours. Also the screensaver is back on my ATI 9800Pro using the 5.6 driver. ;)
Get BOINC WIKIed