Optomized S5 SSE3

Stan Pleban
Stan Pleban
Joined: 2 Dec 05
Posts: 73
Credit: 4635380
RAC: 0

RE: Thanks, MetalWarrior.

Message 39300 in response to message 39285

Quote:

Thanks, MetalWarrior. I think until the dust settles I'm going to stick with S5T0709. It's given me a 27% boost, it's SSE3-specific so it works well with my processor, my results are validating, and I haven't trashed any workunits with it. At some point I'll update again, but I don't think I want to press my luck any further for right now. I like to take things slow and methodical :)

Dig

Dig, at this point I have to agree with you. result using S5T0709 on my Pent 4, 2.8GHz SSE3 no Ht is ~ 30% faster and that relates to 4 hours saved on each. Stan

Pepperammi
Pepperammi
Joined: 20 Feb 05
Posts: 131
Credit: 437943
RAC: 0

And maybe 35-40% on long

And maybe 35-40% on long units with S5T0712- ill do the math

[EDIT]
Yep about 36%. Put in perspective;
Standard: 11:30+
S5T0712: 7:30

Norman_RKN
Norman_RKN
Joined: 9 Feb 06
Posts: 27
Credit: 1368075
RAC: 0

the progress is 0.0055 % per

Message 39302 in response to message 39301

the progress is 0.0055 % per second (so far). sometimes 0.005 sometimes 0.0065.
good job akos :)

Stan Pleban
Stan Pleban
Joined: 2 Dec 05
Posts: 73
Credit: 4635380
RAC: 0

RE: And maybe 35-40% on

Message 39303 in response to message 39301

Quote:

And maybe 35-40% on long units with S5T0712- ill do the math

[EDIT]
Yep about 36%. Put in perspective;
Standard: 11:30+
S5T0712: 7:30

Pepper..it is just too late in the day for me to do any more with it and I am pleased with my 4 hour savings..I am sure that things will continue to develop but I have to call it a day....

Matt3223
Matt3223
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 54
Credit: 448298
RAC: 0

RE: Thanks Matt, although

Message 39304 in response to message 39288

Quote:
Thanks Matt, although I'm not sure if it properly patched it...is there an easy way to tell?

prior to the result being reported...I don't know.....afterwords you can look in the stderr out info on the result id info page to see what was actually ran.....

the only one I have so far looks like this:

Quote:
006-06-24 14:51:56.6422 [normal]: E@H S5R1 4.02 SSE-0007 STABLE

the SSE-0007 STABLE tells me I used the S5S0007 patch......

I too am "hoping" the above patching procedure worked, I did see a Status line in the patch program, but the window shut down after like half a second or something......just got a fleeting glimpse......

I have about 2.5 hours left on the app I manually patched with 0711...I'll have to wait and see to make sure it worked though.

Pepperammi
Pepperammi
Joined: 20 Feb 05
Posts: 131
Credit: 437943
RAC: 0

RE: Thanks Matt, although

Message 39305 in response to message 39304

Quote:
Thanks Matt, although I'm not sure if it properly patched it...is there an easy way to tell?


A quick way without having to start up boinc first is to right click the app after attempting to patch and select properties. It should have a modified date and time. Check the time against your start bar clock or when you thought you patched it.

Stefan
Stefan
Joined: 15 Nov 05
Posts: 52
Credit: 761198
RAC: 0

It must be the patch,

Message 39306 in response to message 39304

It must be the patch, currently, it looks like its sped up the result completion time, from 17hrs 30 mins to around 15hrs 40mins...now whether or not it will be valid remains the question...guess I'll find out tomorrow!

Human Stupidity Is Infinite...

Stefan
Stefan
Joined: 15 Nov 05
Posts: 52
Credit: 761198
RAC: 0

RE: RE: Thanks Matt,

Message 39307 in response to message 39305

Quote:
Quote:
Thanks Matt, although I'm not sure if it properly patched it...is there an easy way to tell?

A quick way without having to start up boinc first is to right click the app after attempting to patch and select properties. It should have a modified date and time. Check the time against your start bar clock or when you thought you patched it.

Hmmm, it was last modified 5 days ago. Oops, maybe I didn't patch it properly, at any rate I'll let that one run its course and try again before the next WU starts up. Or rather just empty my cache and then patch it and then get new WUs.

Human Stupidity Is Infinite...

Stick
Stick
Joined: 24 Feb 05
Posts: 790
Credit: 33136559
RAC: 1066

This app_info file works as

Message 39308 in response to message 39238

This app_info file works as advertized. Any 4.02 WU's in cache are finished up with the 4.02 app. New WU's come in as 4.10 WU's. Just make sure you have both apps in your Einstein folder (and both PDB's).

Good job Uli!

Stick

Quote:
Quote:


einstein_S5R1


einstein_S5R1_4.02_windows_intelx86.exe



einstein_S5R1
402

einstein_S5R1_4.02_windows_intelx86.exe




einstein_S5R1


einstein_S5R1_4.10_windows_intelx86.exe



einstein_S5R1
410

einstein_S5R1_4.10_windows_intelx86.exe


You should use this app_info.xml. It will crunch 4.02 wu's with the unpatched 4.02 application and the newly downloaded 4.10 wu's with the patched 4.10 application.


Athlonheizer
Athlonheizer
Joined: 3 Jun 06
Posts: 33
Credit: 513937
RAC: 0

OMG WTH CPU

OMG WTH

CPU type AuthenticAMD
AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions
Number of CPUs 1
Operating System Microsoft Windows 98
SE, (04.10.2222.00)
Memory 95.5 MB
Cache 976.56 KB

How long have i to wait till this maschine ends a long WU?
When he needs 3h 36min on an S4 WU.
My WU´s finished 4 Days ago.

Athlon

Stay tuned and keep crunching

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.