I found the SSE optimized app (S41.06, didn't try .07) to be a little faster than D41.13 (didn't try .14) on my A64 3700+. But if your computer supports SSE3, U41.04 is the fastest out there for AMD systems.
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
report on
)
report on D41.13/14:
valid:19
invalid:0
Athlon Thoroughbred
)
Athlon Thoroughbred 2400+
D41.12
3914 +/- 8 av.59 - validated
2 invalidated (0 credit).
(for comparision
S40.12
4542 +/- 20 av.121
S40.03
4884 +/- 10 av. 109
)
RE: All WU's with D41.13 on
)
The same thing happend to my Athlon XP 1500+. I installed D41.13 on 1 May and since then all 29 results seem to be invalid. I´ll give D41.14 a try.
http://einsteinathome.org/host/597830/tasks&offset=20
RE: Athlon Thoroughbred
)
Don't forget that D41.12 produces worse results than D41.13/14.
RE: RE: All WU's with
)
Hello Hermann!
I can't remember exactly, but as far as i know the D41.13 had a bug, but it was corrected.
Athlon 1333mhz results with
)
Athlon 1333mhz results with D41.14:
6 complete w/success - 0 failed
3 validated
3 pending
Approx. 25% reduction in processing time vs D40.
Seti Classic Final Total: 11446 WU.
Athlon Tbird 1333: D41.14 is
)
Athlon Tbird 1333:
D41.14 is running 6.5% faster than D41.13
All are validating with no errors so far on both D41.13 & D41.14...
Regards/Beyond
So if the errors are fixed
)
So if the errors are fixed now with the new 'D' version...the 3DNOW! version...is it better than the SSE version?
RE: So if the errors are
)
Accuracy: D41.14 (3DNow!)
Speed: S41.07 (SSE) or U41.04 (SSE3)
I found the SSE optimized app
)
I found the SSE optimized app (S41.06, didn't try .07) to be a little faster than D41.13 (didn't try .14) on my A64 3700+. But if your computer supports SSE3, U41.04 is the fastest out there for AMD systems.
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman