It's really LHR - Large Hungarian Rocket ;)
On my Sempron 2400 longer WU's (r1_14..) run approx 3800-3900s it's about 1100-1200s faster than with D40 and as far no errors in all 13 Wu's.
Thank you for great job.
I switched back to S40.12 for now, but I'llkeep an eye on the D41.12 results I turned in earlier today.
I'll give it a spin on my AthlonXP's and see what happens there.
[EDIT]
the MP2400+'s are Thoroughbred core.
I have another Thoroughbred (XP2400+) and 2 Bartons (XP2800+/XP3200+),
I'll run those on D41.12 today and check if there is any difference
[/EDIT]
I find it interesting that there are several WUs the other crunchers computed on Linux or PowerMac (or both). Like this one. Here is one the others crunched with the standard Albert on windows and with a PowerMac10,1 respectively.
Or here two Linux boxes completing the WU before I did.
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
Thanks.
I found out an easy way to do a little correction.
I will put into D41.xx if the S41.xx will work well with this.
It needs just a minimal more resources (+2kB cache).
I found out an easy way to do a little correction.
I will put into D41.xx if the S41.xx will work well with this.
It needs just a minimal more resources (+2kB cache).
It's ready, but the processing time is about +1,3% higher.
I found out an easy way to do a little correction.
I will put into D41.xx if the S41.xx will work well with this.
It needs just a minimal more resources (+2kB cache).
It's ready, but the processing time is about +1,3% higher.
I get more than 1.3% validation errors. ;)
[edit]Do you post a new download link shortly, or will you just change the download file?[/edit]
Looking at the
)
Looking at the completed/valid/invalid results from AMD X2, I found this:
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/7656091
33 Completed with success
6 Validated
1 Success but Invalid
RE: RE: It's really LHR -
)
Even larger ;) ???
RE: so far 4 invalids out
)
Thanks.
It's horrible, so I will try to adjust the results to closer the original app.
edit: 34/0 (valid/invalid)
RE: RE: RE: It's really
)
I hope, but I have to find a good solution for validation problems at first.
I switched back to S40.12 for
)
I switched back to S40.12 for now, but I'llkeep an eye on the D41.12 results I turned in earlier today.
I'll give it a spin on my AthlonXP's and see what happens there.
[EDIT]
the MP2400+'s are Thoroughbred core.
I have another Thoroughbred (XP2400+) and 2 Bartons (XP2800+/XP3200+),
I'll run those on D41.12 today and check if there is any difference
[/EDIT]
Results: 19 Valid:
)
Results: 19
Valid: 13
Invalid: 0
I find it interesting that there are several WUs the other crunchers computed on Linux or PowerMac (or both). Like this one.
Here is one the others crunched with the standard Albert on windows and with a PowerMac10,1 respectively.
Or here two Linux boxes completing the WU before I did.
RE: valid: 10 invalid:
)
update
valid: 15
invalid: 1
pending: 5 (success)
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
RE: update valid:
)
Thanks.
I found out an easy way to do a little correction.
I will put into D41.xx if the S41.xx will work well with this.
It needs just a minimal more resources (+2kB cache).
RE: I found out an easy way
)
It's ready, but the processing time is about +1,3% higher.
RE: RE: I found out an
)
I get more than 1.3% validation errors. ;)
[edit]Do you post a new download link shortly, or will you just change the download file?[/edit]
cu,
Michael