edit: So far, i have 4 results with D41.12 (A64 3000+) and all four validated - in three cases against results from the windows standard client. The fourth case validated against windows standard and S-40.
In both of your cases a power-pc client was in the group. Maybe that helps identifying the problem...
Edit2: I got a valid result in a group with "albert_4.39_powerpc-apple-darwin" and an S40.12
My athlon1500's seeing a definate improvment. 70 and 75m vs 85-100 with d40. The jury's still out on my , results are coming in in ~44m, with 42-50m observed under s40.12
Wow this is fast. I'll let you guys know when I have a few more results back. Looks like another great job Akos.
Dave
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
Wow this is fast. I'll let you guys know when I have a few more results back. Looks like another great job Akos.
Dave
Really fast! I've only done 1 of the D41.12 WU's but compared against the average of 10 D40's I'm saving about 1750 seconds or just under 30 Minutes. I caution though as this is only one WU while being calibrated by Truxsoft--I'll get back to this board after I have a better sample.
RE: It is running faster.
)
so was mine http://einsteinathome.org/task/27030242
RE: RE: It is running
)
edit: So far, i have 4 results with D41.12 (A64 3000+) and all four validated - in three cases against results from the windows standard client. The fourth case validated against windows standard and S-40.
In both of your cases a power-pc client was in the group. Maybe that helps identifying the problem...
Edit2: I got a valid result in a group with "albert_4.39_powerpc-apple-darwin" and an S40.12
My athlon1500's seeing a
)
My athlon1500's seeing a definate improvment. 70 and 75m vs 85-100 with d40. The jury's still out on my , results are coming in in ~44m, with 42-50m observed under s40.12
A64 3700+ is completing WUs
)
A64 3700+ is completing WUs ~43 mins compared to ~52 with S40.12.
Wow this is fast. I'll let
)
Wow this is fast. I'll let you guys know when I have a few more results back. Looks like another great job Akos.
Dave
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
RE: Wow this is fast. I'll
)
Really fast! I've only done 1 of the D41.12 WU's but compared against the average of 10 D40's I'm saving about 1750 seconds or just under 30 Minutes. I caution though as this is only one WU while being calibrated by Truxsoft--I'll get back to this board after I have a better sample.
Tim
Heyho babes! Athlon 64
)
Heyho babes!
Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice Core, 1800 mhz)
S40.12: 3610 seconds
D41.12: 3248 seconds
=> (S40.12 / D41.12)^-1 = 0,90
Athlon 1333 Thunderbird
D40: 6130 seconds
D41.12: 4770 seconds
=> D41.12 / D40 = 0,78
greets
RE: RE: It is running
)
two validated so far
http://einsteinathome.org/task/27031474
http://einsteinathome.org/task/27034681
Great Stuff! Opteron
)
Great Stuff!
Opteron 275
D42.12 S40.12
2600 3100 ~seconds
Athlon 64 3800+
D42.12 S40.12
2400 2850 ~seconds
No Invalid results and some validated results
My first result with D41.12
)
My first result with D41.12 was also marked as invalid:
http://einsteinathome.org/task/27334817
Very fast, but no cigar so far...