All things Nvidia GPU

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6474
Credit: 9601640238
RAC: 5945503

https://www.tomshardware.com/

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/sapphire-rx-6700-10gb-299-dollars">Rx6700 review. $300 Black Friday deal

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Ian&Steve C.
Ian&Steve C.
Joined: 19 Jan 20
Posts: 3971
Credit: 47327012642
RAC: 65803397

Not sure what an AMD card is

Not sure what an AMD card is doing in the “All things Nvidia” thread. 
 

and your link on the face looks to be for some tomshardware article, but it just links back to your own post? What did you do there? 

_________________________________________________________________________

Nautilus
Nautilus
Joined: 6 Nov 11
Posts: 7
Credit: 13564284
RAC: 0

Few days ago I had the chance

Few days ago I had the chance to try NVIDIA RTX 4090 Founders Edition in Einstein@Home and oh boy it literally chewed up those Gamma ray pulsar Work Units in a minute. I ran it for 1 hour and 30 minutes and Einstein@Home granted me 155K points so far and it keeps increasing every day.

 

Interestingly it only ran Gamma ray work units and nothing else. And work units seemed frozen at 87% and then get completed...

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5872
Credit: 117842358338
RAC: 34796530

Nautilus wrote:... work units

Nautilus wrote:
... work units seemed frozen at 87% and then get completed...

For why this happens, you could try reading here.

The clue is in the thread title :-).

I think it's all about to change.  The new 4000L series of tasks may have a much shorter follow-up stage, based on past behaviour.  Overall, they may take a little longer to crunch since the 0-~90% stage for 4000L series used to take measurably longer.

Cheers,
Gary.

Mike Hewson
Mike Hewson
Moderator
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 6591
Credit: 320464677
RAC: 434943

Nautilus wrote:work units

Nautilus wrote:

work units seemed frozen at 87% and then get completed...

There's basically two parts to a work unit. Firstly there is the bulk of the work in producing a ( fast ) Fourier Transform from a given time series of measurements. Secondly the ( candidate ) signals - one of which may be a discovery - from the first stage must be ranked and sorted into a list to be returned to the project. So the % measure is certainly not a time indicator, as you have discovered. In fact I don't know/remember which part of the code does emit the % amount, nor how it calculates that. Does anyone know ?

Cheers, Mike.

I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

Nautilus
Nautilus
Joined: 6 Nov 11
Posts: 7
Credit: 13564284
RAC: 0

I also noticed only half of

I also noticed only half of the GPU was being utilized and it was fairly cool (50ish celcius degrees)

mikey
mikey
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 12711
Credit: 1839114036
RAC: 3640

Nautilus wrote: I also

Nautilus wrote:

I also noticed only half of the GPU was being utilized and it was fairly cool (50ish celcius degrees)

That means you could try running more than a single task at a time and see if two task running at the same time take less time that each task running individually, if so and you still have headroom left you can try 3 or even more tasks at a time. Remember though that each gpu task needs cpu time and just leaving a single cpu core free to do that may not be enough to run at full speed.

petri33
petri33
Joined: 4 Mar 20
Posts: 124
Credit: 4086715819
RAC: 6693737

Hi Mike! You explained it

Hi Mike!

You explained it so right!

The a) set-up, b) FFT, c) find signal candidates (abc-abc...) loop is done continuously in most Einstein task types and on some other projects (setiathome) too.  i.e. the MAIN-loop.

Sometimes the after processing is done on CPU after the MAIN-loop and then you see a halt in progress percentage. That slow-down could be faked to seem like progress, but it actually represents the time it takes to do a similar amount of (flops) work.

With Nvidia and Cuda Linux executables you may be able to use cuda-mps-server to run multiple program executables in a (super) parallel manner to overcome the pre- and post processing halt. See the NVIDIA documentation.

--

petri

Boca Raton Community HS
Boca Raton Comm...
Joined: 4 Nov 15
Posts: 244
Credit: 10646315586
RAC: 16928748

Hello all,  Question- I

Hello all, 

Question- I just updated the NVIDIA drivers and I received an odd message in BOINC that I am not sure I understand. I am not sure if it is related to the new drivers or the BOINC build I also recently updated.

11/29/2022 7:40:14 AM |  | CUDA: NVIDIA GPU 2 (not used): NVIDIA RTX A4500 (driver version 527.27, CUDA version 12.0, compute capability 8.6, 20470MB, 20470MB available, 23654 GFLOPS peak)
 

Why is it telling me that it is "not used"? It is showing up in the NVIDIA Control Panel and is listed as "use for graphic and compute". 

 

I am not having this issue on any of the other workstations with the same driver. 

Ian&Steve C.
Ian&Steve C.
Joined: 19 Jan 20
Posts: 3971
Credit: 47327012642
RAC: 65803397

by default, with a system

by default, with a system containing mismatched GPUs, BOINC will only use the "best" GPU in the system. you can get around this with the use_all_gpus flag in your cc_config.xml

add <use_all_gpus>1</use_all_gpus>

to the options section of your cc_config.xml

_________________________________________________________________________

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.