I see nothing wrong with this WU. The only unusual thing is that when the older app is suspended, the CPU time is reset (a bug that's fixed in the current apps), and thus the claimed credit is very small when the last resume wasn't long before fnishing the result (which is the case in Result 987578). The validator grants the smallest claimed credit to all Results it considers to be valid. So what's wrong with the validator?
Validation error?
)
I see nothing wrong with this WU. The only unusual thing is that when the older app is suspended, the CPU time is reset (a bug that's fixed in the current apps), and thus the claimed credit is very small when the last resume wasn't long before fnishing the result (which is the case in Result 987578). The validator grants the smallest claimed credit to all Results it considers to be valid. So what's wrong with the validator?
BM
BM
Sorry my fault. I thaught
)
Sorry my fault.
I thaught that the result 987578 was invalid, but it isn't.
Don't even mind the question and sorry for wasting your time