Short work units

Mahbubur
Mahbubur
Joined: 31 Mar 06
Posts: 46
Credit: 258468
RAC: 0
Topic 191730

Ive read somewhere that the slowest 10% of hosts get smaller work units. However, my P3 seems to keep getting long work units.

Why is it that some hosts that have higher benchmarks are getting small wus consistently?

Thx

Tony DeBari
Tony DeBari
Joined: 29 Apr 05
Posts: 30
Credit: 38576823
RAC: 0

Short work units

Quote:

Ive read somewhere that the slowest 10% of hosts get smaller work units. However, my P3 seems to keep getting long work units.

Why is it that some hosts that have higher benchmarks are getting small wus consistently?

Thx


Basically, it's luck of the draw. The server tries to skew the probabilities in favor of assigning a small wu master data file to slower hosts, but it isn't perfect. So, if you received a long wu master data file, you will likely have to wait until all 'slices' of that data file have been crunched before you will request a new one. At that time, you will probably receive one with small wu slices if you are still in the bottom 10% of hosts.

-- Tony

Mahray
Mahray
Joined: 11 Nov 04
Posts: 43
Credit: 146386861
RAC: 319367

Yep, my PIII 700 currently is

Message 44712 in response to message 44711

Yep, my PIII 700 currently is doing a batch of large workunits, taking roughly 21.5 hours each. Still gets the credits though :)

Udo
Udo
Joined: 19 May 05
Posts: 203
Credit: 8945570
RAC: 0

RE: Ive read somewhere that

Quote:

Ive read somewhere that the slowest 10% of hosts get smaller work units. However, my P3 seems to keep getting long work units.

Why is it that some hosts that have higher benchmarks are getting small wus consistently?

Thx

See also this thread, especially message http://einsteinathome.org/node/191541&nowrap=true#46010
and this thread where Bruce describes the algorithm with which Boinc selects long/short running WUs.

Udo

Udo

Alinator
Alinator
Joined: 8 May 05
Posts: 927
Credit: 9352143
RAC: 0

I just noticed this

I just noticed this thread.

I have a K6-2/500 which is running a large data pack at the moment and it takes around 9 days to finish a result running 24/7, but it drew this when S5 started. Slow but steady. :-)

Based on the post from Dr. Allen, it would would seem now you need to have performance roughly equivalent to a PIII 1.0 GHz to be able to draw a long data pack.

The thought just occured to me that you need to take into account your overall BOINC project load as well. IOW, an even faster machine running a lot of projects may be precluded from drawing long packs depending on what its resource share happens to be.

On second thought, the problem with a heavy project load machine would not be that it wouldn't draw a long data pack, but wouldn't be able to finish a result in time without having to go into EDF mode, periodically.

Alinator

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.