Hi all!
People might remember the S5R1 run that started in 2006 and the problems we had with the fileserver hardware at the end of that year. Though the project experienced downtimes and slow progress, we didn't actually lose any valuable result files - or so we thought. Recently however it turned out that the (canonical) result files that dropped in on the server during three days at the end of 2006 are corrupted beyond repair or lost completely, probably related to a single crash of the fileserver.
In the near future (1-2 weeks) we'll begin to re-issue the workunits (~150,000) of the lost results with the label S5R3b. They should run with the Apps that we used at the end of S5R1.
As far as we can foresee this shouldn't affect the current run S5R3b at all, the workunits and tasks should just run side by side as it happened many times before during the transition from one run to the next.
BM
BM
Copyright © 2024 Einstein@Home. All rights reserved.
S5R1b behind
)
Is this possible when running the windows 4.36 powerapp?
I think the use of the app_info.xml file will block other EXE files.
RE: Is this possible when
)
Yeah, this would probably apply to all of the power users apps.
RE: RE: Is this possible
)
And all Beta testers.
BTW:I noticed during
)
BTW:I noticed during yesterday's CVS update,that the result templates have been added.And I would say that S5R3c is avaiting...(Hopefully I can post this :-) )
(And hopefully I did not missed something... :-D )
RE: In the near future (1-2
)
Hello!
This results contain a really intresting data?
RE: RE: In the near
)
Those results were lost and never post-analyzed, so nobody knows.
CU
Bikeman
RE: [snip] so nobody
)
The "Shadow" knows!!!!!
Speaking of analysis, does
)
Speaking of analysis, does anyone know what's happening with the S4 data analysis?
RE: Speaking of analysis,
)
I'd say that it is still in proccess...
* Post-processing (or final
)
* Post-processing (or final analysis) of the E@H S4 run is finished, but the results are still under internal review.
* Unfortunately the lost S5R1 results span the whole frequency range, no current post-processing of the S5R1 results would work even in a limited frequency band until we have those results (again).
* Yep, there is a result template for S5R3c, but unless we find something going wrong in the current S5R3b I don't think it is of any other use than for internal tests. The next public run will most likely be named S5R4.
BM
BM