I don't know why or can't figure it out just yet. Maybe because I went from 2365MHz to 2389 MHz on my AMD Athlon 64 3500+? But everything seems stable according to Prime95. I might just turn down my HTT a bit if that is the problem, but I think I would get computation errors rather than validation error, but that's just me. :-)
I'm using S41.07 and got 3 validation errors yesterday.
...
I don't know why or can't figure it out just yet. Maybe because I went from 2365MHz to 2389 MHz on my AMD Athlon 64 3500+? But everything seems stable according to Prime95.
OC sometimes causes strange things...
I examined the code of Prime95 some months ago because one of my friends wanted to more about it, so i know that Prime95 isn't a best choice for testing OC.
I examined the code of Prime95 some months ago because one of my friends wanted to more about it, so i know that Prime95 isn't a best choice for testing OC.
I've been using Prime95 to test my OCs and always thought it was good for stress testing. What is your best choice for stress testing and why?
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
Woops, I accidentally installed the wrong optimized app on my kids' 1Ghz Athlon yesterday and consequently trashed a bunch of WU's. I reset the project on my lunch break after I realized what I'd done. My apologies to the project and the follow cruchers who will have to wait for credit.
Other than that, I've had nothing but great experience with the SSE3 app on my Pentium D. I am simply amazed at the level of improvement. Way to go, Akos!
I have got few invalid
)
I have got few invalid results. I'm running version S40.12 on AMD Athlon64 3200+ and on AMD Sempron 2500+ socketA.
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/8120480
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/8061950
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/8046570
But as I could see, there are also other computers failing validation of same work with different version of client and on diffeewnt computer.
You are doing great work Akosf, thank you
RE: I have got few invalid
)
Sorry, it's version S41.07
RE: RE: I have got few
)
You can find the answer here :
http://einsteinathome.org/node/191205
Chris
*Die Signatur befindet sich aus technischen Gründen auf der Rückseite dieses Beitrages!*
Some more benchmarks: Pentium
)
Some more benchmarks:
Pentium 4 630 (Prescott), 3 GHz, HT off
Standard app: ~16600 s
S39L: 4560 s
S40.04: 3900-4050
S41.06: 3350
S41.07: 3100-3300
C37: ~8000 s
C41.02: 5600 s
I have some problems with
)
I have some problems with r1_0273.5__* workunits. All crash with similar results:
5.3.12.tx36
1
1
4115.9
- exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
2006-05-24 12:24:26.9687 [normal]: S41.07 (akosf) -> 'projects/einstein.phys.uwm.edu/albert_4.37_windows_intelx86.exe'.
2006-05-24 12:24:26.9687 [normal]: Started search at lalDebugLevel = 0
2006-05-24 12:24:27.9843 [normal]: Checkpoint-file 'Fstat.out.ckp' not found.
2006-05-24 12:24:27.9843 [normal]: No usable checkpoint found, starting from beginning.
***UNHANDLED EXCEPTION****
Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x0040ABF0 read attempt to address 0x00FBD000
1: 05/24/06 12:24:27
1: e:\\einsteinathome\\cfs\\windows_build\\albert4.37\\cfslaldemod.c(945) +1 bytes (TestLALDemod)
I'm using optimized app S41.07 and trux calibrating client 5.3.12.tx36 on a AthlonXP Thoroughbred 2200+
See
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/8760115
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/8758174
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/8758174
http://einsteinathome.org/host/640519/tasks
RE: I have some problems
)
I didn't find its reason yet.
I'm using S41.07 and got 3
)
I'm using S41.07 and got 3 validation errors yesterday. You might look at it here:
http://einsteinathome.org/task/31406806
http://einsteinathome.org/task/31372079
http://einsteinathome.org/task/31372031
I don't know why or can't figure it out just yet. Maybe because I went from 2365MHz to 2389 MHz on my AMD Athlon 64 3500+? But everything seems stable according to Prime95. I might just turn down my HTT a bit if that is the problem, but I think I would get computation errors rather than validation error, but that's just me. :-)
RE: I'm using S41.07 and
)
OC sometimes causes strange things...
I examined the code of Prime95 some months ago because one of my friends wanted to more about it, so i know that Prime95 isn't a best choice for testing OC.
RE: I examined the code of
)
I've been using Prime95 to test my OCs and always thought it was good for stress testing. What is your best choice for stress testing and why?
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
Woops, I accidentally
)
Woops, I accidentally installed the wrong optimized app on my kids' 1Ghz Athlon yesterday and consequently trashed a bunch of WU's. I reset the project on my lunch break after I realized what I'd done. My apologies to the project and the follow cruchers who will have to wait for credit.
Other than that, I've had nothing but great experience with the SSE3 app on my Pentium D. I am simply amazed at the level of improvement. Way to go, Akos!