NUMB3RS just for fun

Mike Hewson
Mike Hewson
Moderator
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 6591
Credit: 320484677
RAC: 435648

RE: Objection. ;-) Not

Message 41176 in response to message 41175

Quote:
Objection. ;-)
Not fair, 9^9 is not a number. It's an equation, the result of which is a number. The original question called for the largest number using 2 digits. Obvious answer is 99. :)

It can actually get worse, because the question doesn't even specify a base ( we assumed decimal )! :-)
I can choose numbers to the base X ( where X is any positive whole number say, but even that is not necessary ), then take the highest single digit in that base ( whatever symbol represents X - 1 ) then use two of those in some combination! This does not have any upper limit ..... but I'll stop being a smart alec now :-)
Cheers, Mike.

I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

ralic
ralic
Joined: 8 Nov 04
Posts: 128
Credit: 695810
RAC: 0

RE: ..... but I'll stop

Message 41177 in response to message 41176

Quote:
..... but I'll stop being a smart alec now :-)


Ha ha. You and me, both! :)

Bird-Dog
Bird-Dog
Joined: 5 Nov 05
Posts: 617
Credit: 5824655
RAC: 0

Cheeky! This is

Message 41178 in response to message 41172

Cheeky!
This is straight-forward. Just TWO DIGITS, each between 1 and 9.......

Is 9 between 1 and 9 ??

John Hunt
John Hunt
Joined: 4 Mar 05
Posts: 1227
Credit: 501906
RAC: 0

I'll take a bit more care


I'll take a bit more care next time I ask a question!!!


ralic
ralic
Joined: 8 Nov 04
Posts: 128
Credit: 695810
RAC: 0

RE: I'll take a bit more

Message 41180 in response to message 41179

Quote:
I'll take a bit more care next time I ask a question!!!


Yes John, you should be feeling non-plussed or is that -+'d?

John Hunt
John Hunt
Joined: 4 Mar 05
Posts: 1227
Credit: 501906
RAC: 0

An archeologist claims he


An archeologist claims he found some gold coins dated 46 B.C. Do you believe him?

Michael Karlinsky
Michael Karlinsky
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 888
Credit: 23502182
RAC: 0

RE: An archeologist claims

Message 41182 in response to message 41181

Quote:

An archeologist claims he found some gold coins dated 46 B.C. Do you believe him?

No.

Michael

ralic
ralic
Joined: 8 Nov 04
Posts: 128
Credit: 695810
RAC: 0

RE: An archeologist claims

Message 41183 in response to message 41181

Quote:
An archeologist claims he found some gold coins dated 46 B.C. Do you believe him?


Yes, but only if he was excavating in British Columbia after 1946.

Bird-Dog
Bird-Dog
Joined: 5 Nov 05
Posts: 617
Credit: 5824655
RAC: 0

46 BC trivia In 153 BC the

46 BC trivia

In 153 BC the Romans set the new year as January 1st, but set it at 355 days.

A bit later they reverted back to celebrating the new year in March.

Finally in 46 BC Julius Caesar created the the Julian Calendar and the new year was to fall on January 1st again and last 365 days.

Unfortunately the calendar was out of sync and an extra 90 days were added to 46 BC making it the longest year ever clocking in at 445 days.

Stan Pleban
Stan Pleban
Joined: 2 Dec 05
Posts: 73
Credit: 4635380
RAC: 0

RE: An archeologist claims

Message 41185 in response to message 41181

Quote:

An archeologist claims he found some gold coins dated 46 B.C. Do you believe him?

Yes, I believe him. Gold coins were struck as far back as 750-700 BC.
The first gold coins initially were pieces that were picked out of river beds and struck with the symbol of a lion denoting a royal authority.

Also it was important for trade that the weight was approx the same for each struck coin.

that being the case, they were initially not pure gold, but an amalgam of gold and silver we now call "electrum" since they were yet to be refined. That came about 50-100 years later.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.