More than 6000 phantom computers???

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5874
Credit: 118405431967
RAC: 25750546
Topic 189360

Somebody in authority needs to look at the list of computers for user ID 54612. There appears to be more than 6000 in the list, all identical, and all but the first two (so it seems - I didn't check more than a dozen or two) having a single associated work unit.

Potentially a lot of trashed work units there....

Cheers,
Gary.

Wurgl (speak^Wcrunching for Special: Off-Topic)
Wurgl (speak^Wc...
Joined: 11 Feb 05
Posts: 321
Credit: 140550008
RAC: 0

More than 6000 phantom computers???

Quote:

Somebody in authority needs to look at the list of computers for user ID 54612. There appears to be more than 6000 in the list, all identical, and all but the first two (so it seems - I didn't check more than a dozen or two) having a single associated work unit.

Potentially a lot of trashed work units there....

Look at the name of this user :-)

But yes, I agree looks really like phantom machines.

Walt Gribben
Walt Gribben
Joined: 20 Feb 05
Posts: 219
Credit: 1645393
RAC: 0

RE: Somebody in authority

Quote:

Somebody in authority needs to look at the list of computers for user ID 54612. There appears to be more than 6000 in the list, all identical, and all but the first two (so it seems - I didn't check more than a dozen or two) having a single associated work unit.

Potentially a lot of trashed work units there....

In what way trashed? It only means each WU has a result that won't come back in time, which isn't a problem since its sent out four times.

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5874
Credit: 118405431967
RAC: 25750546

Trashed as in wasted.

Trashed as in wasted. There'll probably be enough other random failures in that large body of work to require a significant number of resends and all of that unfortunately is a bit of a waste. Not to mention results having to stay in the database for longer before being deleted and users having extra pendings and hence delays in awarding credit.

Cheers,
Gary.

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5874
Credit: 118405431967
RAC: 25750546

RE: Look at the name of

Message 12604 in response to message 12601

Quote:

Look at the name of this user :-)

Heh... I didn't take much notice of that....

Maybe he has another 6000 still to create :).

Cheers,
Gary.

John McLeod VII
John McLeod VII
Moderator
Joined: 10 Nov 04
Posts: 547
Credit: 632255
RAC: 0

Look here

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5874
Credit: 118405431967
RAC: 25750546

RE: Look here

Message 12606 in response to message 12605

Are you talking to me???

I've already posted in that thread, trying to draw the user's attention to the rather unusual problem he has. When there seemed to be no response from him, I started this one in case the admins needed to be alerted. He is hardly going to try to merge or delete 6000+ phantom computers so I guess his best bet is to wipe the slate clean and start again. Maybe the admins can delete them for him. Nobody seems terribly concerned about it so I'll just shut up and mind my own business.

Cheers,
Gary.

Heffed
Heffed
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 257
Credit: 12368
RAC: 0

RE: He is hardly going to

Message 12607 in response to message 12606

Quote:
He is hardly going to try to merge or delete 6000+ phantom computers


Why not? There is a 'select all' option when merging. It might take a few minutes to process, but it should be painless.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.