Einstein takes over

Phatbowler
Phatbowler
Joined: 11 Apr 07
Posts: 2
Credit: 842
RAC: 0
Topic 192670

Einstein is not being fair to my other projects. It will pass it to one project after an hour, then it goes back to that same project. Sometimes it works on it for more than an hour. When I suspend Einstein, another project starts, but once I resume Einstein, it stops the previous one that automatically started and begins Einstein again.

What is going on???

anders n
anders n
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 123
Credit: 1656300
RAC: 0

Einstein takes over

Boinc is probably doing this so your Einstein WU-s will finish before deadline.
Then the other projects will get more time.
This is the way Boinc works and in the end it evens out just fine.

Anders n

Udo
Udo
Joined: 19 May 05
Posts: 203
Credit: 8945570
RAC: 0

RE: Einstein is not being

Quote:

Einstein is not being fair to my other projects. It will pass it to one project after an hour, then it goes back to that same project. Sometimes it works on it for more than an hour. When I suspend Einstein, another project starts, but once I resume Einstein, it stops the previous one that automatically started and begins Einstein again.

What is going on???

also have a look here (http://boinc.berkeley.edu/cpu_sched.php)

Udo

Phatbowler
Phatbowler
Joined: 11 Apr 07
Posts: 2
Credit: 842
RAC: 0

Normal, gotcha. I will

Message 63085 in response to message 63084

Normal, gotcha. I will resume Einstein again then. It just got me worried about my other projects not getting enough time.

Is it better to "Leave applications in memory while suspended"? yes or no???

Thanks

Odysseus
Odysseus
Joined: 17 Dec 05
Posts: 372
Credit: 20999357
RAC: 5572

RE: RE: Normal, gotcha.

Message 63086 in response to message 63085

Quote:

Quote:
Normal, gotcha. I will resume Einstein again then. It just got me worried about my other projects not getting enough time.

If E@h gets more than its share of CPU time in order to meet a deadline, once the task is finished BOINC will refrain from getting more work from here until the other projects have caught up. Over the long term the resource shares you’ve chosen will be honoured.

Is it better to "Leave applications in memory while suspended"? yes or no???


Unless you’re short of RAM, “yes�. Only a few projects require it, but it generally makes things run smoother.

Udo
Udo
Joined: 19 May 05
Posts: 203
Credit: 8945570
RAC: 0

RE: Is it better to "Leave

Message 63087 in response to message 63085

Quote:

Is it better to "Leave applications in memory while suspended"? yes or no???

that depends on your system and on the projects (and their applications) you run...

- some projects (applications) require a large amount of memory (>500 MB for predictor@home for example)

- some applications had problems and crashed when swiching to an other project and beeing removed from memory

- if you are running many projects you might end up with a lot of memory allocated

I use the different profiles (home, work, school) to have this parameter either swiched to yes or no.
My computers with fewer memory (< 500 MB) use the profile with option "no", the others are allowed to keep the application in memory.

Udo

Annika
Annika
Joined: 8 Aug 06
Posts: 720
Credit: 494410
RAC: 0

Well, that's not quite the

Well, that's not quite the point iirc, because the WUs don't usually get stored in physical memory. All they will do is "consume swap space", as it is already said in the preferences. So, if you have enough of that, the amount of RAM shouldn't really be an issue. I turned that option on on a "512 MB minus shared RAM graphics card" notebook and noticed no impact, except the "virtual memory"- or what it's called, sorry, mostly using German Windows- usage is somewhat higher, which you can see in the taskmanager.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.