e@h slower under Linux?

3pPmiogpGgcpNZZ8t64PN6wSy1cG
3pPmiogpGgcpNZZ...
Joined: 21 Mar 05
Posts: 1
Credit: 2347224
RAC: 0
Topic 188807

Hi there,

the benchmark tests lead to significantly better results (factor 2) under windows compared to those of the benchmark test under Linux on the same machine (AMD64).

Is there any work around to reduce this lack in performance?
Does it have to do with Linux, or with the Boinc client?

Thanks,
hum3767

faeshn
faeshn
Joined: 25 Feb 05
Posts: 44
Credit: 442304
RAC: 0

e@h slower under Linux?

http://heisewiki.xuboo.com/index.php?title=Off-Topic%40Einstein%40Home
Willst du Einzelkämpfer bleiben? Wir freuen uns über Verstärkung.
Und bezüglich der Lahmarschigkeit des Linuxclients, es gibt Leute die arbeiten daran, mittlerweile sollte er etwas schneller sein als vorher, aber ist (noch) nicht offiziell draußen.

faeshn, normalerweise Linuxuser, sogar Wanderer www.lbwand.org, aber bei e@h läuft der Windoofclient

Holmis
Joined: 4 Jan 05
Posts: 1118
Credit: 1055935564
RAC: 0

> Hi there, > > the

> Hi there,
>
> the benchmark tests lead to significantly better results (factor 2) under
> windows compared to those of the benchmark test under Linux on the same
> machine (AMD64).
>
> Is there any work around to reduce this lack in performance?
> Does it have to do with Linux, or with the Boinc client?
>
> Thanks,
> hum3767

The benchmarks for windows under boinc 4.19 is to high. This is altered in boinc 4.25 to give a more realistic value.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.