Credits are no granted
2 Feb 2005 23:42:49 UTC
Topic 187432
(moderation:
so look here
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/320336
three claimed Credit, but no grantet Credit [img]http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php?userID=380 [/img]
Credits are no granted
)
The second result has an error, but is called valid anyway.
core_client_version 4.59 core_client_version
stderr_txt
Can't set up shared mem: -1
GLUT: Fatal Error in screensaver: could not open display:
Validate state: Valid
Maybe this one was randomly selected to determine the credit for all results (in this case 0, because of 0 sec CPU time). Is that possible?
> The third result has an
)
> The third result has an error, but is called valid anyway.
>
> stderr out 4.59
>
> Can't set up shared mem: -1
> GLUT: Fatal Error in screensaver: could not open display:
>
>
>
> Validate state: Valid
>
>
> Maybe this one was randomly selected to determine the credit for all
> results(in this case 0, because of 0 sec CPU time). Is that possible?
>
>
>
but this Host has returned 0.00 i think, and no going to the Valid i thinks, but there are three Hosts with Valid Results ...
Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli
[img]http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php?userID=380 [/img]
a
)
a push...............
because this is looking strange
Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli
[img]http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php?userID=380 [/img]
I don't think the project
)
I don't think the project founders had nuts like me (with a basement full of machines chewing on work units) in mind for this testing phase... I'm almost to the point of crunching the work faster than it can be validated. :D
"Chance is irrelevant. We will succeed."
- Seven of Nine
> > The third result has an
)
> > The third result has an error, but is called valid anyway.
> > Validate state: Valid
> > Maybe this one was randomly selected to determine the credit for all
> > results(in this case 0, because of 0 sec CPU time). Is that possible?
Obviously this has been the (exceptional) result of several things happening at the same time:
- a restart in Phase III
- probably a still unfixed bug that reset the CPU to zero
- an "empty" result file (which is perfectly correct, and agrees with others)
(empty does not mean of zero size in this case, but no scientific content)
- one of the project meintainers reporting
- the validator, also still in testing, choosing the first of all identical results for canonical (the version submitted into CVS days ago has this fixed)
My apologies...
I'm almost to the point of
)
I'm almost to the point of crunching the work faster than it can be validated. :D
==========
@ Grand Rapids, I know where your coming from GRRO, I just joined the project 4 days before you did & when I first started out nothing was being Validated for me for the first week or so and my Pending WU's & Pending Credits ballooned way up. But over the last week now they both have dropped rapidly.
If you look at what most people are running for RAC you will see that the majority of them are only running a little bit each day, this leads to getting way ahead of the field when somebody runs full time with a lot of PC's I think.
I constantly have a lot of Pending WU's that haven't even been sent to anybody else yet sitting in my Account. Eventually they will be sent out to other people and crunched & credit granted for all ... :)
or look here:
)
or look here: http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/312649
Greetings from Germany
Basti
Join Ad Astra