If anyone was curious I have been running a bone stock Raspberry Pi 4 and a Raspberry Pi 5 just to see what the average performance difference is between the two. I will be taking them down today but here are the numbers as they stand currently; (No overclock, same MicroSD storage, same OS, both running in a headless configuration with RealVNC service running.)
Pi 4 is showing a recent average of approximately 800 credits while the Pi 5 is showing approximately 1200. Not much credit, but it does highlight the fact that the Pi 5 is significantly faster than the 4.
If anyone was curious I have been running a bone stock Raspberry Pi 4 and a Raspberry Pi 5 just to see what the average performance difference is between the two. I will be taking them down today but here are the numbers as they stand currently; (No overclock, same MicroSD storage, same OS, both running in a headless configuration with RealVNC service running.)
Pi 4 is showing a recent average of approximately 800 credits while the Pi 5 is showing approximately 1200. Not much credit, but it does highlight the fact that the Pi 5 is significantly faster than the 4.
So I just got back to crunching recently and found this thread. I also have an Orange Pi 5 to play with. Guess I'll give it a go for science, and not just the research we're doing. Let's see what this little Rockchip 3588 can do.
So I just got back to crunching recently and found this thread. I also have an Orange Pi 5 to play with. Guess I'll give it a go for science, and not just the research we're doing. Let's see what this little Rockchip 3588 can do.
Great! I'd love to see what that thing can do, I had been looking at that one as well. I would guess it will do better than the Pi-5 with those additional cores....
That's my guess as well. Part of why I got it. While I love the idea of the Rapi, I wanted to see how far such a platform/idea could be pushed. Prolly like most of us.
So my pie has started to bake. Results have started to show: results
It indeed looks to be doing more work than the Rapi. I ordered better cooling, as my pi is cookin at this point and I'm wondering if it would do the work even faster with proper cooling for this heavy a workload.
So my pie has started to bake. Results have started to show: results
It indeed looks to be doing more work than the Rapi. I ordered better cooling, as my pi is cookin at this point and I'm wondering if it would do the work even faster with proper cooling for this heavy a workload.
Both my Pi 4 and 5 ran 3 tasks at 55c to 60c. I have forgotten how hot they will get before they start to throttle but I recall it is somewhere north of 70c.
Both have ICE towers to keep the CPU cool. At 100% load: 4 = 41°C/106°F and the 5 = 58°C/136°F.
I run Einstein, Universe, and WCG, lately only Einstein has tasks.
I tried overclocking the 5 to 3000 MHz but it hung. I've since gotten an official RPi power supply and will try again JIC it was the cheap supply I could buy asap when I got the 5 (it meets the power specs).
If anyone was curious I have
)
If anyone was curious I have been running a bone stock Raspberry Pi 4 and a Raspberry Pi 5 just to see what the average performance difference is between the two. I will be taking them down today but here are the numbers as they stand currently; (No overclock, same MicroSD storage, same OS, both running in a headless configuration with RealVNC service running.)
Pi 4 is showing a recent average of approximately 800 credits while the Pi 5 is showing approximately 1200. Not much credit, but it does highlight the fact that the Pi 5 is significantly faster than the 4.
Raspberry Pi 4 RAC = 814
Raspberry Pi 5 RAC = 1238
G
Gandolph1 wrote: If anyone
)
Are you going to tweak them to try and get better performance out of them or something else?
mikey wrote: Are you going
)
No, I'm going to put them on some other projects as soon as they finish their work que...
So I just got back to
)
So I just got back to crunching recently and found this thread. I also have an Orange Pi 5 to play with. Guess I'll give it a go for science, and not just the research we're doing. Let's see what this little Rockchip 3588 can do.
Holdolin wrote: So I just
)
Great! I'd love to see what that thing can do, I had been looking at that one as well. I would guess it will do better than the Pi-5 with those additional cores....
That's my guess as well.
)
That's my guess as well. Part of why I got it. While I love the idea of the Rapi, I wanted to see how far such a platform/idea could be pushed. Prolly like most of us.
So my pie has started to
)
So my pie has started to bake. Results have started to show: results
It indeed looks to be doing more work than the Rapi. I ordered better cooling, as my pi is cookin at this point and I'm wondering if it would do the work even faster with proper cooling for this heavy a workload.
Holdolin wrote: So my pie
)
Both my Pi 4 and 5 ran 3 tasks at 55c to 60c. I have forgotten how hot they will get before they start to throttle but I recall it is somewhere north of 70c.
Mine: RPi 4 RAC ≈
)
Mine:
RPi 4 RAC ≈ 1200
RPi 5 RAC ≈ 1750 (≈ 1.45 times faster)
Both have ICE towers to keep the CPU cool. At 100% load: 4 = 41°C/106°F and the 5 = 58°C/136°F.
I run Einstein, Universe, and WCG, lately only Einstein has tasks.
I tried overclocking the 5 to 3000 MHz but it hung. I've since gotten an official RPi power supply and will try again JIC it was the cheap supply I could buy asap when I got the 5 (it meets the power specs).
CyborgSam wrote: I run
)
I run the SiDock short tasks with my 3 R-Pi 4's.