Is anyone running one or more Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti Super GPU ?

GWGeorge007
GWGeorge007
Joined: 8 Jan 18
Posts: 3060
Credit: 4964617686
RAC: 1412297
Topic 231156

Hey there!  Hi guy's and gal's!  I am just very curious (I'm also known as Curious George) if anyone is running one or more Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti Super GPU ?  Not just a 4070 Ti or a 4070 Super, but a 4070 Ti Super.  I don't care what brand you bought, whether from Nvidia, or ASUS (TUF or ROG series), MSI, Gigabyte, Zotac, Galax, or whom ever.  I just want to know what you are doing with it.

If you haven't seen the short 10-Minute video from TechPowerUp comparing 10x RTX 4070 Ti Super's, I'll list it here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udST-Hm7fg8 

I am curious if you:

1)  Like the card...

2)  Are doing BOINC with the card, and if so...

3)  What project(s) are you running, and...

4)  Does it meet your expectations?

If you choose to answer, I'd really appreciate it!  Also, if you don't mind, what are you running it on?

i.e.:   What operating system, what CPU, and how much system RAM.

George

Proud member of the Old Farts Association

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6438
Credit: 9566183125
RAC: 8828470

https://einsteinathome.org/ac

###edited###

https://einsteinathome.org/account/20509/computers

Chooka refers to those two rtx 4070 it's as 4070 ti supers.

I assume that boinc can't tell the difference.

 

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Ian&Steve C.
Ian&Steve C.
Joined: 19 Jan 20
Posts: 3945
Credit: 46729552642
RAC: 64261327

BOINC can tell the

BOINC can tell the difference, you misinterpreted Chooka's message.

He said he has the 4070Ti, and that it is 2-slot. he mentioned that the 4070Ti Super from the same manufacturer is also 2 slot, that's what he meant when he said they are the same.

_________________________________________________________________________

JWNoctis
JWNoctis
Joined: 8 Nov 07
Posts: 6
Credit: 92134528
RAC: 71

Back on topic, here's

Back on topic, here's something that might satisfy your curiosity. Note it's not yet stabilized on RAC.

It's the PNY XLR8 version of the card, with a gigantic 3.5-slot cooler that kept the GPU below 50 degC when limited to 180W with nvidia-smi. It's incredibly efficient at that temperature and wattage, doing about 1.4M credits of mixed 3xO3AS/2xBRP7 per day with that power target. The whole system is pulling 290W, with the CPU limited to 65W and doing Prime95 at the same time. It is actually slightly cheaper than the base-clock MSI offering in local area, presumably due to comparative lack of brand recognition.

It's a lovely piece of kit that did well enough in games too, except that it blocked the second PCIe x16(4.0 x2 electrical) slot on the motherboard out of use. No more expandability there. It's also somewhat noisy, even at minimum fan RPM while running. Someone elsewhere took issue with the fact that the minimum the fans could be set to run is 30% PWM for some reason, and that actual measured PWM is even greater.

And yes, BOINC can definitely tell the difference.

GWGeorge007
GWGeorge007
Joined: 8 Jan 18
Posts: 3060
Credit: 4964617686
RAC: 1412297

JWNoctis wrote: Back on

JWNoctis wrote:

Back on topic, here's something that might satisfy your curiosity. Note it's not yet stabilized on RAC.

It's the PNY XLR8 version of the card, with a gigantic 3.5-slot cooler that kept the GPU below 50 degC when limited to 180W with nvidia-smi. It's incredibly efficient at that temperature and wattage, doing about 1.4M credits of mixed 3xO3AS/2xBRP7 per day with that power target. The whole system is pulling 290W, with the CPU limited to 65W and doing Prime95 at the same time. It is actually slightly cheaper than the base-clock MSI offering in local area, presumably due to comparative lack of brand recognition.

It's a lovely piece of kit that did well enough in games too, except that it blocked the second PCIe x16(4.0 x2 electrical) slot on the motherboard out of use. No more expandability there. It's also somewhat noisy, even at minimum fan RPM while running. Someone elsewhere took issue with the fact that the minimum the fans could be set to run is 30% PWM for some reason, and that actual measured PWM is even greater.

And yes, BOINC can definitely tell the difference.

Thank you JWNoctis for your answer and explanation.  I'll be watching your RAC progress.

You have a nice system and a very economical one at that with it only pulling 290W.  Well done!

George

Proud member of the Old Farts Association

JWNoctis
JWNoctis
Joined: 8 Nov 07
Posts: 6
Credit: 92134528
RAC: 71

GWGeorge007 wrote:Thank you

GWGeorge007 wrote:

Thank you JWNoctis for your answer and explanation.  I'll be watching your RAC progress.

You have a nice system and a very economical one at that with it only pulling 290W.  Well done!

Thank you!

And a bit of an update: Increased GPU utilization factor back to 1 for all apps, when 1x O3AS consumed more than 2GB of VRAM and 3 started getting in the way of other things I do. They trip over each other in GPU usage in any case. BRP7 does not appear to scale very far either, even though it only takes 0.7GB. BRP7 would also slow down O3AS something grand, to 1/10 the speed if they happened to run together, for some reason. Some 30% loss of throughput expected, but there should also be even less power consumption. BOINC really should have a better way of managing GPU use, for applications that require GPU only part of the time.

Strangely, running just one app at a time produces coil whine, while running two does not audibly do. I may go back to 0.5 for that reason alone.

The card itself seemed about comparable to an RTX 3090, if not even faster. Quite amazing developments for a single generation. 4080 / 4080 SUPER should do even better, being the same silicon and more-or-less the same board and the same overhead, with more computational resources enabled. Unfortunately, price increase outstrips performance increment there.

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6438
Credit: 9566183125
RAC: 8828470

Previous experience with

Jwnoctis,

Previous experience with several systems has reliably supported your observations.

  1. Brp7/meerKat does not run well at the same time on the same GPU as All-Sky GW.
  2. Brp7/meerKat does not scale well past 1x most of the time.
  3. But Brp7/meerKat does scale pretty good under MPS.
  4. And All-Sky GW scales pretty good under MPS with v1.14 of the task.

Since you are running Linux you could experiment with the Nvidia MPS server. But depending on what else you need to be running besides specific cuda tasks from Boinc it may not be possible.

Tom M

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

JWNoctis
JWNoctis
Joined: 8 Nov 07
Posts: 6
Credit: 92134528
RAC: 71

Tom, Thanks for the info.

Tom,

Thanks for the info. I think I would look into it. A brief skim of MPS doc has left me wondering why it was not enabled by default for supporting setups. Need to read further.

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6438
Credit: 9566183125
RAC: 8828470

JWNoctis wrote: Tom, Thanks

JWNoctis wrote:

Tom,

Thanks for the info. I think I would look into it. A brief skim of MPS doc has left me wondering why it was not enabled by default for supporting setups. Need to read further.

It is not running by default because it requires specific CUDA coding. It will not work without that coding. OCL drivers allow a much wider range of GPU tasks to be supported under boinc.  ,(as I understand it,)

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.