archae86 commented on Times (Elapsed/CPU) for BRP6-Beta-cuda55 compared to BRP6-cuda32 - Results and Discussion Thread
For comparison, the same presentation of AgentB's previously reported 460, using the available 1.54 returns a few minutes...
1st July 2015
|
archae86 commented on Times (Elapsed/CPU) for BRP6-Beta-cuda55 compared to BRP6-cuda32 - Results and Discussion Thread
Phil's set of four hosts give some welcome data on this comparison. Happily he uses a pretty short queue, so data for an...
1st July 2015
|
archae86 commented on Times (Elapsed/CPU) for BRP6-Beta-cuda55 compared to BRP6-cuda32 - Results and Discussion Thread
My hope to see some more modern results seems in process at GTX 760 host belonging to Phil
With just four 1.54...
30th June 2015
|
archae86 commented on Times (Elapsed/CPU) for BRP6-Beta-cuda55 compared to BRP6-cuda32 - Results and Discussion Thread
AgentB wrote:1st GPU: nVidia GTX-460 768MB (MSI) PCIe v2.0 x16 - system monitor
2nd GPU: nVidia GTX-...
30th June 2015
|
archae86 commented on Times (Elapsed/CPU) for BRP6-Beta-cuda55 compared to BRP6-cuda32 - Results and Discussion Thread
Quote:The current GPU task mix is 2x1.52 and a 1.54 (a rebranded 1.52). By watching the %completed figure over a long...
30th June 2015
|
Copyright © 2024 Einstein@Home. All rights reserved.