Not sure what you tried, but it shows valid XHTML 1.0 Strict for me... I guess either you missed something on copying the source or the parser had a burp...
Oh, I know that... The way I read what Alinator said to you was that they took the http://validator.w3.org page, viewed source, copied and pasted that into the direct input, and it said it was invalid...
Yep, the validator must have belched. It worked the second time around.
It would have been amusing if the page which runs the validator wasn't strict compliant (although not unheard of). ;-)
@ Brian: Ah yes...... I see that now. Maybe if I'm feeling bored I'll add a filter to Proxomitron to check for the # sign and plug it in (but don't hold you're breath waiting)! :-)
RE: RE: Not sure what you
)
Oh, I know that... The way I read what Alinator said to you was that they took the http://validator.w3.org page, viewed source, copied and pasted that into the direct input, and it said it was invalid...
Hmmm.... Yep, the
)
Hmmm....
Yep, the validator must have belched. It worked the second time around.
It would have been amusing if the page which runs the validator wasn't strict compliant (although not unheard of). ;-)
@ Brian: Ah yes...... I see that now. Maybe if I'm feeling bored I'll add a filter to Proxomitron to check for the # sign and plug it in (but don't hold you're breath waiting)! :-)
Alinator