...Credit hounds (and others): I am granting credit for ALL those results which were marked as invalid or validate error during the time window above...
Maybe that needs some times?
I think script must be writen to re-grant the credit lost for false-invalidated WUs otherwise everyone with invalid WUs during the error time would become his credit re-granted.
Maybe that needs some times?
I think script must be writen to re-grant the credit lost for false-invalidated WUs otherwise everyone with invalid WUs during the error time would become his credit re-granted.
I have also 2 units false-invalited, I also think we should wait for the new script to grant us credit
...Credit hounds (and others): I am granting credit for ALL those results which were marked as invalid or validate error during the time window above...
Actually you had ALREADY been granted credit for the result, but the web page 'workunit.php' was not displaying this properly. If you had clicked on the result in question then you would have seen the granted credit on that next web page that would have been displayed.
Anyway I have modified the 'workunit.php' web page so that it now correctly shows the granted credit.
Actually you had ALREADY been granted credit for the result, but the web page 'workunit.php' was not displaying this properly. If you had clicked on the result in question then you would have seen the granted credit on that next web page that would have been displayed.
Anyway I have modified the 'workunit.php' web page so that it now correctly shows the granted credit.
Please look at the validator again because this one just showed up http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/19025946
Both reported AFTER you thought you solved the problem less than an hour ago Thanks JR
I am betting it was uploaded and validated, then you reported it, which made the validation show up already invalid.
No Pooh Bear I have a constant connection and use trux client report immediately option....look at my host list I have reported 3 wu's since Bruce thought he fixed the problem
One other problem here is that merely uploading the result doesn't trigger validation, the client has to report the result as well before it's submitted to the validator.
Actually you had ALREADY been granted credit for the result, but the web page 'workunit.php' was not displaying this properly. If you had clicked on the result in question then you would have seen the granted credit on that next web page that would have been displayed.
Anyway I have modified the 'workunit.php' web page so that it now correctly shows the granted credit.
If this is due to the validator running in a special mode then it’s fine. But if it is "normal", I can see a problem there. A lot of people would be tempted to use an erratic ultra fast client.
RE: Would the credit show
)
Maybe that needs some times?
I think script must be writen to re-grant the credit lost for false-invalidated WUs otherwise everyone with invalid WUs during the error time would become his credit re-granted.
RE: Maybe that needs some
)
I have also 2 units false-invalited, I also think we should wait for the new script to grant us credit
RE: Would the credit show
)
Actually you had ALREADY been granted credit for the result, but the web page 'workunit.php' was not displaying this properly. If you had clicked on the result in question then you would have seen the granted credit on that next web page that would have been displayed.
Anyway I have modified the 'workunit.php' web page so that it now correctly shows the granted credit.
Cheers,
Bruce
Director, Einstein@Home
RE: Actually you had
)
evrything is ok, thanks for fixing it
RE: RE: RE: Please look
)
One other problem here is that merely uploading the result doesn't trigger validation, the client has to report the result as well before it's submitted to the validator.
Alinator
Aha! Many thanks,
)
Aha! Many thanks, Bruce.
Graham.
Looks like these (15 to 17
)
Looks like these (15 to 17 Nov) were the lucky days for hosts like this one, getting huge credit for nothing, with tens of results like this:
Outcome - Client state - CPU time - claimed credit - granted credit
Client error - Compute error - 68.52 - 0.21 - 12.33
Client error - Compute error - 69.58 - 0.19 - 12.33
Client error - Compute error - 72.89 - 0.22 - 12.33
A sample WU (the host in error is the first):
Outcome - Client state - CPU time - claimed credit - granted credit
Client error - Compute error - 72.89 - 0.22 - 12.33
Validate error – Done - 3,273.28 - 12.33 - 12.33
Validate error – Done - 10,131.96 - 12.33 - 12.33
Validate error – Done - 5,065.23 - 12.33 - 12.33
Validate error – Done - 8,220.56 - 12.33 - 12.33
Success – Done - 3,109.99 - 12.33 - 12.33
Success – Done - 2,773.07 - 12.33 - 12.33
If this is due to the validator running in a special mode then it’s fine. But if it is "normal", I can see a problem there. A lot of people would be tempted to use an erratic ultra fast client.