Well, I'm going to collapse these superpositoned eigenstates into one by observing that I'm the WINNER! And don't forget to let the cat out.
Yes you were! In my area even cats must be on leashes if outside to be honest though no one does that nor really cares as they don't leave big piles of evidence that they were around. There mjust be a few posts per week on our neighborhood FaceBook page about people cleaning up after their dogs and people STILL don't do it.
Must be universal, my neighborhood scandal page is now complaining about people who bag the poop but leave the bag.
Good grief I would not be happy about that EITHER!! They did put up some cameras near our park and are notifying some of the more agregious offenders.
Are you referring to the animals or to the owners of the animals?
People of course, I don't think the dogs are to blame for going, it's the people that don't care about the consequences of leaving it just sitting there.
Are you referring to the animals or to the owners of the animals?
People of course, I don't think the dogs are to blame for going, it's the people that don't care about the consequences of leaving it just sitting there.
mikey, I was trying to suggest that possibly people were dropping a load with the "agregious offenders" statement. So much for humor. I will have to work on delivery. I may have taken this thread to a new low not before experienced on E&H
... I was trying to suggest that possibly people were dropping a load with the "agregious offenders" statement. So much for humor. I will have to work on delivery. I may have taken this thread to a new low not before experienced on E&H
They say timing is everything and E@H is a tough crowd. As for "new low", maybe we should take that as a challenge! Should we restrict entries to scatological humor, or open it up? Anyway Robl, don't feel bad for dropping a dud (hahahaha! - that's my entry).
Ideas are not fixed, nor should they be; we live in model-dependent reality.
... I was trying to suggest that possibly people were dropping a load with the "agregious offenders" statement. So much for humor. I will have to work on delivery. I may have taken this thread to a new low not before experienced on E&H
They say timing is everything and E@H is a tough crowd. As for "new low", maybe we should take that as a challenge! Should we restrict entries to scatological humor, or open it up? Anyway Robl, don't feel bad for dropping a dud (hahahaha! - that's my entry).
... I was trying to suggest that possibly people were dropping a load with the "agregious offenders" statement. So much for humor. I will have to work on delivery. I may have taken this thread to a new low not before experienced on E&H
They say timing is everything and E@H is a tough crowd. As for "new low", maybe we should take that as a challenge! Should we restrict entries to scatological humor, or open it up? Anyway Robl, don't feel bad for dropping a dud (hahahaha! - that's my entry).
Grin!!!
WE HAVE A WINNER!!!! CONGRATULATIONS!!!
Robl is the WINNER of this game for being the first person to have to explain a joke in this thread!!!
... I was trying to suggest that possibly people were dropping a load with the "agregious offenders" statement. So much for humor. I will have to work on delivery. I may have taken this thread to a new low not before experienced on E&H
They say timing is everything and E@H is a tough crowd. As for "new low", maybe we should take that as a challenge! Should we restrict entries to scatological humor, or open it up? Anyway Robl, don't feel bad for dropping a dud (hahahaha! - that's my entry).
Grin!!!
WE HAVE A WINNER!!!! CONGRATULATIONS!!!
Robl is the WINNER of this game for being the first person to have to explain a joke in this thread!!!
You know what to do next.
Now THAT'S funny!!! Gratz Robl!
Ideas are not fixed, nor should they be; we live in model-dependent reality.
Gary Charpentier wrote:mikey
Good grief I would not be happy about that EITHER!! They did put up some cameras near our park and are notifying some of the more agregious offenders.
mikey wrote: some of the more
Are you referring to the animals or to the owners of the animals?
robl wrote:mikey wrote: some
People of course, I don't think the dogs are to blame for going, it's the people that don't care about the consequences of leaving it just sitting there.
mikey wrote:robl wrote:mikey
mikey, I was trying to suggest that possibly people were dropping a load with the "agregious offenders" statement. So much for humor. I will have to work on delivery. I may have taken this thread to a new low not before experienced on E&H
robl wrote:... I was trying
They say timing is everything and E@H is a tough crowd. As for "new low", maybe we should take that as a challenge! Should we restrict entries to scatological humor, or open it up? Anyway Robl, don't feel bad for dropping a dud (hahahaha! - that's my entry).
Ideas are not fixed, nor should they be; we live in model-dependent reality.
cecht wrote:robl wrote:... I
Grin!!!
robl wrote:cecht wrote:robl
WE HAVE A WINNER!!!! CONGRATULATIONS!!!
Robl is the WINNER of this game for being the first person to have to explain a joke in this thread!!!
You know what to do next.
mikey wrote:robl wrote:cecht
Now THAT'S funny!!! Gratz Robl!
Ideas are not fixed, nor should they be; we live in model-dependent reality.
And Robl won with just 16
And Robl won with just 16 replies. That must be a record!
Oh, wait, this is a double post for me..... and it doesn't matter, hahahahahahaha! Whew, that was fun.
Ideas are not fixed, nor should they be; we live in model-dependent reality.