My result with "Pentium 4 - 630" Hyperthreading Enable :
S41.06 = 10,221.00 sec
S40 = 8,944.43 sec
It isn't good news.
I'm wondering on the Pentium4 processors they how dislike the mixture of FPU/SSE code.
I will try to find a solution to optimize for these cores.
(I will bring home a P4 laptop or something else...)
1°)Are you about to deplete your ideas of optimisation of the code.
Have you still some idea in your mind ?
2°)It could be interesting (for me of course :-) and i suppose for others)
to resume here (or in de pdf) all your techniques of optimisation for each client.(add eventually links on the web that inspire you)
You could start by copying part of the program (if you are autorised to...) that can be optimised... then perharps remember us main caracteristic of processor...
and finally dévelop procedures involved.
I appreciate very much your work ! :-)
Perhaps you will find i am very demanding. So consider part 2°) as only a query :-)
1?)Are you about to deplete your ideas of optimisation of the code.
Have you still some idea in your mind?
Of course. I have always newer and newer ideas, but I have also lots of other ideas from other areas of the life. And I would like to try out them also. :)
Quote:
2?)It could be interesting (for me of course :-) and i suppose for others) to resume here (or in de pdf) all your techniques of optimisation for each client. (add eventually links on the web that inspire you)
Well, I always try to find out new things, but of course I use lots of documentations and i have lot of experience. They are also important. I don't do a list because it is always changing and grows.
Quote:
You could start by copying part of the program (if you are autorised to...) that can be optimised... then perharps remember us main caracteristic of processor... and finally d鶥lop procedures involved.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand it exactly. It isn't to difficult to decode a program and exchange some parts. I use three softwares for it. Borland Turbo Debugger, Flat Assembler and Volkov Commander. As far as i know these softwares are free to everybody, so everybody can do omptimize any kind of executables.
Have you thought about doing a version of E@H for GPUs? (Is that even possible with the current generation, or will we have to wait for DirectX 10 before this becomes realistic?)
Great work, akosf, many
)
Great work, akosf, many thanks to you.
My PIII 866 is a lot faster with S41.06 than an AthlonX2 4200+ with standard application on the same WU (me ca 7500 sec, the other ca 13500 sec.
My Athlon XP2800+ gains about 600 sec/WU compared to the latest D40 (now about 3000 sec/wu instead of 3600 sec/WU).
We drain einstein off WU's ;-).
greetings groundhog
My result with "Pentium 4 -
)
My result with "Pentium 4 - 630" Hyperthreading Enable :
S41.06 = 10,221.00 sec
S40 = 8,944.43 sec
for me the best version is S40 ;)
I wait new version of "U41" :)
bye and good work Akosf!! ;)
ps.
sorry for my english... i am italian ;)
RE: My result with "Pentium
)
It isn't good news.
I'm wondering on the Pentium4 processors they how dislike the mixture of FPU/SSE code.
I will try to find a solution to optimize for these cores.
(I will bring home a P4 laptop or something else...)
RE: I'm wondering on the
)
P4 doesn't like FPU code and I guess it doesn't like work in general ;)
MrS
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
I tried S41.07 and got this
)
I tried S41.07 and got this result
http://einsteinathome.org/task/27831199
Anders n
RE: I tried S41.07 and got
)
Could you download it again?
RE: RE: I tried S41.07
)
Ok it is running now.
Anders n
@aksof 1°)Are you about to
)
@aksof
1°)Are you about to deplete your ideas of optimisation of the code.
Have you still some idea in your mind ?
2°)It could be interesting (for me of course :-) and i suppose for others)
to resume here (or in de pdf) all your techniques of optimisation for each client.(add eventually links on the web that inspire you)
You could start by copying part of the program (if you are autorised to...) that can be optimised... then perharps remember us main caracteristic of processor...
and finally dévelop procedures involved.
I appreciate very much your work ! :-)
Perhaps you will find i am very demanding. So consider part 2°) as only a query :-)
RE: 1?)Are you about to
)
Of course. I have always newer and newer ideas, but I have also lots of other ideas from other areas of the life. And I would like to try out them also. :)
Well, I always try to find out new things, but of course I use lots of documentations and i have lot of experience. They are also important. I don't do a list because it is always changing and grows.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand it exactly. It isn't to difficult to decode a program and exchange some parts. I use three softwares for it. Borland Turbo Debugger, Flat Assembler and Volkov Commander. As far as i know these softwares are free to everybody, so everybody can do omptimize any kind of executables.
Have you thought about doing
)
Have you thought about doing a version of E@H for GPUs? (Is that even possible with the current generation, or will we have to wait for DirectX 10 before this becomes realistic?)