For such a wide disparity, doesn't that rate as something being 'broken'?
Well, it's more a feature no longer holding it's original interest ( client side credit calculation ). The broken bit was people writing their own BOINC clients, substituting them in place, and the slope just got slippery .... which I admit I really found bizarre. Maybe some thought it was Office Space.
Cheers, Mike.
I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...
... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal
RE: For such a wide
)
Well, it's more a feature no longer holding it's original interest ( client side credit calculation ). The broken bit was people writing their own BOINC clients, substituting them in place, and the slope just got slippery .... which I admit I really found bizarre. Maybe some thought it was Office Space.
Cheers, Mike.
I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...
... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal
RE: RE: RE: ... If so,
)
Running ABC@home with four instances in parallel (Intel HT on the two cores), it settled to give a RAC of 1050.
With a mix of Einstein and Collatz, it looks to be settling to a combined RAC of about 1000.
Total power consumption is holding steady at about 40W, including powering the cable modem for the internet connection.
Happy crunchin',
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)