I am not getting credits for the work done ??

Conan
Conan
Joined: 19 Jun 05
Posts: 172
Credit: 8380252
RAC: 9120

I have been installing and

I have been installing and uninstalling a number of different clients (about 4 different ones) to see if the benchmark results change (which they don't). Trux has been on for at least 2 days but I am not sure how many work units it has processed.

Matt LO
Matt LO
Joined: 7 Feb 06
Posts: 44
Credit: 386731
RAC: 0

RE: RE: How do I do

Message 31589 in response to message 31587

Quote:
Quote:

How do I do that? I thought that is was turned on by default when downloaded, so i have not tried to do anything else with the client.

That is correct, calibration is set to ON for all by default. When did you install truxoft? It may take more than 20 WU to settle into a "normal" calibrating mode.

Well actually for the linux client, it's NOT on by default. You need to add a truxoft_prefs.xml file to your boinc directory. The windows zip file on truxofts website has this xml file in it, but the linux version only contains the boinc executable.

Create a file truxoft_prefs.xml with the following contents:

all

You will then after 30 results see your credits calibrated.

Conan
Conan
Joined: 19 Jun 05
Posts: 172
Credit: 8380252
RAC: 9120

RE: RE: RE: RE: How

Message 31591 in response to (parent removed)

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:

How do I do that? I thought that is was turned on by default when downloaded, so i have not tried to do anything else with the client.

That is correct, calibration is set to ON for all by default. When did you install truxoft? It may take more than 20 WU to settle into a "normal" calibrating mode.

Well actually for the linux client, it's NOT on by default. You need to add a truxoft_prefs.xml file to your boinc directory. The windows zip file on truxofts website has this xml file in it, but the linux version only contains the boinc executable.

Create a file truxoft_prefs.xml with the following contents:

all

You will then after 30 results see your credits calibrated.


Thanks a heap for that. I am very new to Linux, still expect it to do things Windows does. Your help is very much appreciated.

Matt LO
Matt LO
Joined: 7 Feb 06
Posts: 44
Credit: 386731
RAC: 0

RE: Thanks a heap for

Message 31592 in response to message 31591

Quote:

Thanks a heap for that. I am very new to Linux, still expect it to do things Windows does. Your help is very much appreciated.

Your welcome. It's not actually a linux thing that's the problem. It's how the zip files on trux's site were prepared. The linux gzip just doesn't include the required XML file, while the windows zip does. Not including it in the linux gzip is just an oversight by the person preparing it, IMO, and it makes the statement on the website "calibration is turned on by default . . ." confusing.

MarkF
MarkF
Joined: 12 Apr 05
Posts: 393
Credit: 1516715
RAC: 0

RE: MarkF, I would love my

Message 31593 in response to message 31584

Quote:
MarkF, I would love my Opterons to be performing as well as yours. The difference must be Linux as you have Windows. I wish they would sort out the credit disparity between the two systems.
Thanks again.


I have to thank Akos for that, maybe he can work his magic on all the platforms eventually. (fingers crossed)
Boinc Studio provides the credit correction such that the 'Result duration correction factor' is normalized to 1.

sslickerson
sslickerson
Joined: 16 Apr 05
Posts: 14
Credit: 715231
RAC: 0

RE: Your welcome. It's not

Message 31594 in response to message 31592

Quote:
Your welcome. It's not actually a linux thing that's the problem. It's how the zip files on trux's site were prepared. The linux gzip just doesn't include the required XML file, while the windows zip does. Not including it in the linux gzip is just an oversight by the person preparing it, IMO, and it makes the statement on the website "calibration is turned on by default . . ." confusing.

My thoughts exactly, sorry about the confusion folks...

Tim

Conan
Conan
Joined: 19 Jun 05
Posts: 172
Credit: 8380252
RAC: 9120

Got another one with no

Got another one with no credit but says successful:-

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/8428107

differnet machine this time.
I also have been credited for the previous 3 that gave no credit.

P.S. the calibration file is working fine, thanks for that.

Matt LO
Matt LO
Joined: 7 Feb 06
Posts: 44
Credit: 386731
RAC: 0

RE: Got another one with no

Message 31596 in response to message 31595

Quote:

Got another one with no credit but says successful:-

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/8428107

differnet machine this time.
I also have been credited for the previous 3 that gave no credit.

P.S. the calibration file is working fine, thanks for that.

Yes it is sucessful, but click on Result ID and look at validate state. Invalid. It's sucessful because the quorum was fulfilled, yet your result was determined invalid. This is expected behaviour once in a while with the linux beta app. Notice: BETA app. They are trying to fix the intermittant invalids for the official linux app to come.

Conan
Conan
Joined: 19 Jun 05
Posts: 172
Credit: 8380252
RAC: 9120

Ok, thanks. I will see what

Ok, thanks. I will see what happens over time.

Pooh Bear 27
Pooh Bear 27
Joined: 20 Mar 05
Posts: 1376
Credit: 20312671
RAC: 0

Success means it was

Success means it was downloaded, crunched, returned and reported correctly. Nothing more. It does not determine validity.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.