HT vs. Non-HT with Ryzen 7 2700x

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6508
Credit: 9618433285
RAC: 3373204

Who would have guessed? 

Who would have guessed?   Running a single thread task on two different 2700x cpus with different MBs.

Both system's CPU time vs. wall clock processing time shows the CPU to be in the ballpark of 10 seconds less than the wallclock time.

Windows 10 is averaging just under 2 hours per CPU task.

Ubuntu 20 is averaging about 90 minutes.

I have just switched both to 8 CPU tasks.

I believe the Universe at Home Linux effect has carried over to E@H Gamma-Ray CPU tasks... 

The gpu's processing speeds seem to be pretty consistent across either Linux or Windows.

Tom M

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6508
Credit: 9618433285
RAC: 3373204

Tom M wrote: I believe the

Tom M wrote:

I believe the Universe at Home Linux effect has carried over to E@H Gamma-Ray CPU tasks... 

I wonder if I can get a 1/3 drop in time on GW tasks?

On my 3950x box the highest priority has been processing Gravity Wave cpu tasks and then chasing the highest E@H RAC I can manage using gpus.  GW cpu tasks are running 4-5 hours for 6-8 tasks depending on the mix/amount of WCG tasks I run.

Since I have now demonstrated the ability to reliably generate an Ubuntu/Amd gpu setup across multiple MB's/cpu brands maybe it is time to revisit GW cpu tasks under Ubuntu.  This assumes stable hardware something I haven't been able to do with my Mining rig. Hmmmm.....

Tom M

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Keith Myers
Keith Myers
Joined: 11 Feb 11
Posts: 4992
Credit: 18833349481
RAC: 5773226

You've not really discovered

You've not really discovered something "new" Tom.

Linux has always been generally regarded as more "efficient" compared to Windows.

Better code optimization in the libraries compared to Windows DLL's and also a lot less unnecessary background processes running compared to Windows.

 

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6508
Credit: 9618433285
RAC: 3373204

At a single task per

At a single task per GPU:

Tom M wrote:

Windows 10 is averaging just under 2 hours per CPU task.

Ubuntu 20 is averaging about 90 minutes.

I have just switched both to 8 CPU tasks.

At 8 tasks per 2700x

Win10 seems to be averaging 3 hours and 19 minutes

Ubuntu seems to be averaging 2 hours and 41 minutes.

Switched to 4 tasks.

Tom Miller

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6508
Credit: 9618433285
RAC: 3373204

Keith Myers wrote: Linux has

Keith Myers wrote:

Linux has always been generally regarded as more "efficient" compared to Windows.

Better code optimization in the libraries compared to Windows DLL's and also a lot less unnecessary background processes running compared to Windows.

So my most important question is does it make a significant difference on GPU production?

My Mining rigs have been my least stable platforms.  And it has been very helpful to have the Windows-based tools for attempting to track down the problem(s).  So does using Linux give my GPUs a 10% processing boost or what?

Assuming I have a stable mining rig I may have to literally test that out.  I need to determine if I can run 5 GPUs reliably under Win10 like I previously did with the 2700x/X470 rig and a 1 to 4 expansion card.  I am running a different cpu (Amd 3900x), motherboard (x570) and a 1 to 8 expansion card right now.

Tom M

 

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Ian&Steve C.
Ian&Steve C.
Joined: 19 Jan 20
Posts: 4015
Credit: 47618108500
RAC: 44055817

Tom M wrote: Keith Myers

Tom M wrote:

Keith Myers wrote:

Linux has always been generally regarded as more "efficient" compared to Windows.

Better code optimization in the libraries compared to Windows DLL's and also a lot less unnecessary background processes running compared to Windows.

So my most important question is does it make a significant difference on GPU production?

My Mining rigs have been my least stable platforms.  And it has been very helpful to have the Windows-based tools for attempting to track down the problem(s).  So does using Linux give my GPUs a 10% processing boost or what?

Assuming I have a stable mining rig I may have to literally test that out.  I need to determine if I can run 5 GPUs reliably under Win10 like I previously did with the 2700x/X470 rig and a 1 to 4 expansion card.  I am running a different cpu (Amd 3900x), motherboard (x570) and a 1 to 8 expansion card right now.

Tom M

 

that will vary project to project. i know its a 10-15% performance boost on GPUGRID on Linux vs Windows. not sure about here.

_________________________________________________________________________

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6508
Credit: 9618433285
RAC: 3373204

Ian&Steve C. wrote: that

Ian&Steve C. wrote:

that will vary project to project. i know its a 10-15% performance boost on GPUGRID on Linux vs Windows. not sure about here.

Well, apparently the LInux gpu drivers and two Rx 5600 xt's don't get along.  Back to Windows 10 after an exhausting 2-3 days of trying to get something/anything to work.

Tom M

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.