Credit Pending

m.mitch
m.mitch
Joined: 11 Feb 05
Posts: 187
Credit: 11025628
RAC: 0

RE: .... [snip]..... ...

Message 23989 in response to message 23988

Quote:

.... [snip].....

... and no, TAH is a made up projects ...

Bloody Hell!!! I was half way through signing up before I'd finished reading your post ;-)

Wonder what I was actually signing up to?!

I think EAH should send out four Albert work units, like SAH, that may reduce the credit pending problem.

And I hope we're still giving Jim Fekete some of the answers he was after

Jim Baize
Jim Baize
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 116
Credit: 582144
RAC: 0

RE: I think EAH should send

Message 23990 in response to message 23989

Quote:
I think EAH should send out four Albert work units, like SAH, that may reduce the credit pending problem.

Einstein used to send out 4, just like Seti. It was only recently they changed to sending out only 3 initial WU's. It slows down validation, but they feel that it increases their computational power.

Jim

Jim

jl
jl
Joined: 1 Jan 06
Posts: 18
Credit: 7477
RAC: 0

how do / did they compute the

Message 23991 in response to message 23990

how do / did they compute the score- i love it wheni crunch with 2 big clusters like physics and s* speaking for erlin- i report 30, they report 8 and 9 and i et 9... wish the clusters only crunched with other clusters scorewise cause their low score is inversly proportionate (sp?) to the computing power sorta; seems like more power lower score till you get to some of the p3's that'll take 10k secs to report 15 credits. dunno

Quote:
Quote:
I think EAH should send out four Albert work units, like SAH, that may reduce the credit pending problem.

Einstein used to send out 4, just like Seti. It was only recently they changed to sending out only 3 initial WU's. It slows down validation, but they feel that it increases their computational power.

Jim


Paul D. Buck
Paul D. Buck
Joined: 17 Jan 05
Posts: 754
Credit: 5385205
RAC: 0

RE: how do / did they

Message 23992 in response to message 23991

Quote:
how do / did they compute the score- i love it wheni crunch with 2 big clusters like physics and s* speaking for erlin- i report 30, they report 8 and 9 and i et 9... wish the clusters only crunched with other clusters scorewise cause their low score is inversly proportionate (sp?) to the computing power sorta; seems like more power lower score till you get to some of the p3's that'll take 10k secs to report 15 credits. dunno


There are problems with Linux machines having low benchmark scores. So, you have been linked up with them for some of the work and this hurts you in the great cobblestone race.

The later generation BOINC Client Software has a new mechanism and we have hopes that this will eliminate this problem once and for all. The first test will be with SETI@Home Enhanced. Bruce Allen said he would look into it for Einstein@Home. BUt, it will have to wait for another update to the application before we would see a change.

jl
jl
Joined: 1 Jan 06
Posts: 18
Credit: 7477
RAC: 0

mac's too cause thats really

Message 23993 in response to message 23992

mac's too cause thats really a linux core too ive noticed. it's be great to get all the os's on the same plane but thats about impossible to do

Quote:
Quote:

There are problems with Linux machines having low benchmark scores. So, you have been linked up with them for some of the work and this hurts you in the great cobblestone race.

The later generation BOINC Client Software has a new mechanism and we have hopes that this will eliminate this problem once and for all. The first test will be with SETI@Home Enhanced. Bruce Allen said he would look into it for Einstein@Home. BUt, it will have to wait for another update to the application before we would see a change.


Michael Roycraft
Michael Roycraft
Joined: 10 Mar 05
Posts: 846
Credit: 157718
RAC: 0

RE: mac's too cause thats

Message 23994 in response to message 23993

Quote:
mac's too cause thats really a linux core too ive noticed. it's be great to get all the os's on the same plane but thats about impossible to do

Problem's kind of bad because there are so many more WUs in a datafile now, so the pairings in co-crunchers go on for more WUs. You could be in a much worse situation, do you realize that? That could be you, crunching on a linux box and hoping for a couple of Windows machines to come along and pull your low scores up to normal.

microcraft
"The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice" - MLK

arcturus
arcturus
Joined: 11 Feb 05
Posts: 44
Credit: 1008160
RAC: 0

RE: There are problems with

Message 23995 in response to message 23992

Quote:
There are problems with Linux machines having low benchmark scores. So, you have been linked up with them for some of the work and this hurts you in the great cobblestone race.

Easily cured by running the optimized Linux client found here:

http://einsteinathome.org/host/249812/tasks

My claimed is actually better than most unoptimized Win clients. Check it out:

http://einsteinathome.org/host/249812/tasks

jl
jl
Joined: 1 Jan 06
Posts: 18
Credit: 7477
RAC: 0

how would one optimise a

Message 23996 in response to message 23995

how would one optimise a windows client?

Quote:
Quote:

Easily cured by running the optimized Linux client found here:

http://einsteinathome.org/host/249812/tasks

My claimed is actually better than most unoptimized Win clients. Check it out:

http://einsteinathome.org/host/249812/tasks

Jim Baize
Jim Baize
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 116
Credit: 582144
RAC: 0

RE: how would one optimise

Message 23997 in response to message 23996

Quote:
how would one optimise a windows client?

reformat the hard drive and install linux! ROFL

sorry, just had to say it.

Jim

Stick
Stick
Joined: 24 Feb 05
Posts: 790
Credit: 33127550
RAC: 1495

RE: how would one optimise

Message 23998 in response to message 23996

Quote:
how would one optimise a windows client?

Try looking here.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.