> Maybe not, but if you just had a little patience, waited 14 days at minimum
> before you started to check your WUs and their results, you'd see a lot less
> of this behaviour. With the deadline being 7 days, you wait a week extra in
> case the unit gets resent to another computer.
>
> Not just hack into your list the day after you crunched, sent and reported 14
> units and expect them all to have been credited already. What with the bugs
> still floating around, you may just as well have been crunching zero credit
> units that they just now keep to the side.
>
Jeez, sorry to have pissed in your cheerios.. I just found it strange that out of my computers working on units, 2 of which working at about the same speed, one PC (amd64)would have 0 credits out of 14 WUs completed while the other(p4) had credits assigned to 12 of the 15 WUs it had completed.
> Maybe not, but if you just
)
> Maybe not, but if you just had a little patience, waited 14 days at minimum
> before you started to check your WUs and their results, you'd see a lot less
> of this behaviour. With the deadline being 7 days, you wait a week extra in
> case the unit gets resent to another computer.
>
> Not just hack into your list the day after you crunched, sent and reported 14
> units and expect them all to have been credited already. What with the bugs
> still floating around, you may just as well have been crunching zero credit
> units that they just now keep to the side.
>
Jeez, sorry to have pissed in your cheerios.. I just found it strange that out of my computers working on units, 2 of which working at about the same speed, one PC (amd64)would have 0 credits out of 14 WUs completed while the other(p4) had credits assigned to 12 of the 15 WUs it had completed.
I guess reporting possible bugs = "impatience" :/
Read this post by Bruce
)
Read this post by Bruce Allen.