My Celeron 433 got an extra long unit(243.10 Hz) that is supposed to take 9d 8h 47m 19s to complete. *lol*
And yes, I know there are much shorter units. But don't forget the people who crunch for more than one project. They may face serious problems with the current deadline.
I just got one that says 45 hours on my AMD X2 4800+ system. I was getting them at 13 1/2 hours and this one just showed up. This is a major change from the old batch where they only took 2 1/2 hours. If this keeps up much longer I'm going to go back to having seti as my primary and einstein as my backup. I'd much rather have a lot of smaller ones than I big giant one. Credits aren't even close to making it equitable.
If you with last series get 53 kredits for 9000 seconds why now for 630000 seconds dont give 371 credit? You only give 204 credit!
All of us making Enstein project live works for something. And credits are just number and for project developer cost is zero. You can give 1000 credits: and nothing heapen: the world stil rotate around sun.
The current science application seems to have a problem on these hosts, running about 25% slower than it should. Probably a compiler problem.
There are no problems on AMD/Linux, Intel/Linux and Intel/Win.
I'm shure Bernd Machenschalk will fix this problem as soon as possibe, so just sit down and hold the flag. ;-)
The time, the boinc client shows for the units is mostly far away from reality, so just wait till the first units are finished.
What I've seen so far, given credits are between ~130 and more than 300, so the time they take will be appropriate different.
On the three 'working' platforms the credit reduction is below 20%. We all have to face this and this is really ok.
> S5R1 took on average 9400 seconds on an AMD X2 4800+, this gives 20.9 average cobblestones/hour approximately.
S5R2 (1 done) took 53270 seconds for 191 claim which gives 12.9 cobblestones/hour.
For this machine this works out at 38.3% reduction per hour.
30% would be around 14.5 cobblestones/hour (for this computer) which still puts it below most other projects that I work for including Rosetta.
Increase in WU length by 5.8 times. Increase in amount granted per WU is 3.5 times.
The 30% granted cobblestones above others was on a per second basis (does this then scale up to per hour basis as well?).
Waiting to see what my Opterons do, first estimate is over 18 hours (64800s).
Am now crunching my first S5R2 workunit and the time to completion has gone up from sbout 16 hours to an estimated 50!!! Sheesh there must be a lot more in these new ones than the old!
____________
The current science application seems to have a problem on these hosts, running about 25% slower than it should. Probably a compiler problem.
The current S5R2 code control the FPU in ugly and crazy ways.
It's coming from the compiler. The AMD CPUs dislike it.
akosf
Hello Akos! Please take a look at this host. If it is possible for you to get in touch with the owner and see if you can figure out what's going on, that would probably be great.
BTW, are there any considerations to reissuing S5RI work or being out of work for a few days to take S5R2 back into beta and work on clearing up the bugs?
Looks like it will take
)
Looks like it will take around 26 hours on a Mac G5 2.0GHz.
RE: My Celeron 433 got an
)
I just got one that says 45 hours on my AMD X2 4800+ system. I was getting them at 13 1/2 hours and this one just showed up. This is a major change from the old batch where they only took 2 1/2 hours. If this keeps up much longer I'm going to go back to having seti as my primary and einstein as my backup. I'd much rather have a lot of smaller ones than I big giant one. Credits aren't even close to making it equitable.
If you with last series get
)
If you with last series get 53 kredits for 9000 seconds why now for 630000 seconds dont give 371 credit? You only give 204 credit!
All of us making Enstein project live works for something. And credits are just number and for project developer cost is zero. You can give 1000 credits: and nothing heapen: the world stil rotate around sun.
@all AMD/Windows
)
@all AMD/Windows users:
The current science application seems to have a problem on these hosts, running about 25% slower than it should. Probably a compiler problem.
There are no problems on AMD/Linux, Intel/Linux and Intel/Win.
I'm shure Bernd Machenschalk will fix this problem as soon as possibe, so just sit down and hold the flag. ;-)
The time, the boinc client shows for the units is mostly far away from reality, so just wait till the first units are finished.
What I've seen so far, given credits are between ~130 and more than 300, so the time they take will be appropriate different.
On the three 'working' platforms the credit reduction is below 20%. We all have to face this and this is really ok.
cu,
Michael
[edit]spelling
> S5R1 took on average 9400
)
> S5R1 took on average 9400 seconds on an AMD X2 4800+, this gives 20.9 average cobblestones/hour approximately.
S5R2 (1 done) took 53270 seconds for 191 claim which gives 12.9 cobblestones/hour.
For this machine this works out at 38.3% reduction per hour.
30% would be around 14.5 cobblestones/hour (for this computer) which still puts it below most other projects that I work for including Rosetta.
Increase in WU length by 5.8 times. Increase in amount granted per WU is 3.5 times.
The 30% granted cobblestones above others was on a per second basis (does this then scale up to per hour basis as well?).
Waiting to see what my Opterons do, first estimate is over 18 hours (64800s).
Am now crunching my first
)
Am now crunching my first S5R2 workunit and the time to completion has gone up from sbout 16 hours to an estimated 50!!! Sheesh there must be a lot more in these new ones than the old!
____________
Mrs Miggins - A lady of uncommon refinement
Hi
)
Hi ziegenmelker,
The current S5R2 code control the FPU in ugly and crazy ways.
It's coming from the compiler. The AMD CPUs dislike it.
akosf
RE: Hi
)
Waiting for your "miracle" then
regards
CONSTANTINOS
Gravity increases significantly in Autumn, because apples fall in large numbers during that time!
RE: Hi
)
Hello Akos! Please take a look at this host. If it is possible for you to get in touch with the owner and see if you can figure out what's going on, that would probably be great.
BTW, are there any considerations to reissuing S5RI work or being out of work for a few days to take S5R2 back into beta and work on clearing up the bugs?
Thanks,
Brian
Hi Akos, nice to read you
)
Hi Akos,
nice to read you again! :-)
Thanks for explaining.
I like to add, that it's the MS-Compiler which BM uses, the GCC Code for Linux ist fine.
cu,
Micha