Greetings,
Relevant project: Gamma-ray pulsar search #5 v1.08 () x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Recently the required CPU time has increased by a factor of 3. Is this unusual behavior? Is it scientifically substantive behavior? Something else perhaps?
Beast regards,
EigenState
Copyright © 2024 Einstein@Home. All rights reserved.
EigenState wrote:Recently the
)
Your computers are hidden so it's not possible for anyone else to check your results to see what you are talking about exactly.
What I can guess is that it might be a bit unusual but not unexpected. Quite some time ago, I seem to remember that the FGRP5 search enjoyed quite a reduction (perhaps a factor of more than 2.5x) in the crunch times. So it's probably just a return to data that is more like what was being processed at an earlier time.
A lot probably depends on the content of the large data files that the individual tasks you receive actually analyse. You can tell which data file is being used as its name is part of the task name.
There have been quite a few different data files being used for that search recently. I'm more interested in the ones for GPU tasks - I collect them as they are released. It just so happens that the CPU ones get collected as well so here is a recent list of those.
After my name, you can see the size in bytes, the date downloaded and the full name of the data file. I only even looked at this as a result of your query but the thing that strikes me is that many of these files used to be the same size and now that has changed. The other unusual thing is the frequency with which new ones are being issued - almost on a daily basis. It used to be a *lot* longer than that. Maybe this has something to do with the Seti influx.
Maybe if you check your tasks list on the website (others can't) you could tell us if there is a correlation between crunch time and the actual data file being analysed. Do particular files give tasks that are 'long' whilst others give tasks that are 'short'? I suspect you'll find something like that.
Also, as a separate exercise, you could see if there is any correlation between the size of the file in bytes and the crunch time for tasks based on that file. There are big changes in size. Do those contribute to big changes in crunch time? I suspect there may not be much effect there but it would be nice to know.
Cheers,
Gary.
Greetings, Thank you! All
)
Greetings,
Thank you!
All of the long CPU time tasks were from LATeah1013F. The others, which varied little in CPU time were from LATeah1008F, LATeah1011F, and LATeah1012F. It would thus appear that there is indeed a qualitative correlation with the size of the data file.
The computer should now be visible.
Best regards,
EigenState
Thank you. Was wondering
)
Thank you.
Was wondering about this when I spotted this post. Not used to processing CPU tasks over here.
Greetings, The correlation
)
Greetings,
The correlation appears to be confirmed by recent LATeah1017F.dat tasks.
Best regards,
ES