am I a hare or a turtle?
12 Feb 2006 10:35:55 UTC
Topic 190761
(moderation:
am I a hare or a turtle?
My computer calculates about 6 hours by wu, the beast it is an AMD Sempron 2600 +++++++
The screensaver is made very well, one can follow the cursor and can observe the spiral of waves gravitationnelles,like the song of the galaxies in spirals, but after 5 minutes, it is tiring.
To when the cursor with option to load a weapon and instead of the zodiac, of faces,: Bin Laden, Bush, Margaret Tatcher,Berlusconi.
bye
suis-je un lièvre ou une tortue?
Mon ordinateur calcule environ 6 heures par wu , la bête c'est un AMD Sempron 2600 +++++++
Le screensaver est très bien fait, on peut suivre le curseur et observer la spirale des ondes gravitationnelles,tel le chant des
galaxies en spirales, mais après 5 minutes, c'est lassant.
A quand le curseur avec option charger une arme et au lieu du zodiaque, des tronches: Bin Laden, Bush, Margaret Tatcher,Berlusconi.
bye
am I a hare or a turtle?
)
I guess you're a turtle !
Ariane
RE: RE: am I a hare or a
)
Okay...what's the best optimization for BOINC then? Crunch3R?
RE: Okay...what's the best
)
There is no Einstein optimized client, besides the current released Einstein application. Einstein does not have an open source. There is testing always being done to better optimize it.
Using an "Optimized" BOINC will gain you nothing in Einstein except give you larger requested credit, which in many eyes is cheating.
Translated to French:
Il y a le client optimisé d'aucun Einstein, en plus de l'application d'Einstein libérée du courant. Einstein n'a pas de source ouverte. Là évalue être fait toujours pour mieux l'optimiser.
L'utilisation de BOINC "Optimisé" vous gagnera rien dans Einstein sauf ne vous donne le plus grand crédit demandé, qui dans beaucoup d'yeux triche.
A few weeks back we had this
)
A few weeks back we had this type of a discussion about "optimized clients" in the Anandtech DC forums. As PooBear27 correctly points out, an optimized client may give you a higher "requested credit" for a given workunit, but given the design of the BOINC system in the way credit is actually granted, an optimized client would really only be effective if all the other participants who completed a given workunit were also using optimized clients, so as to actually get a higher granted amount of credit for each.
The Rosetta@Home project administrators have not chosen to implement the voting design for granting credit, so in that project a higher requested amount of credit does get granted when a workunit is completed.
* Someone feel free to correct me if I've mispoken.
"Chance is irrelevant. We will succeed."
- Seven of Nine
RE: Translated to
)
I really like this translation.
It was nice, but really funny.
Thanks.
RE: RE: Translated to
)
Cette traduction en francais n'a vraiment aucun sens, c'est evident que ca a ete l'oeuvre d'un un robot traducteur !
Ariane
RE: RE: RE: am I a hare
)
Go to the forum Cruncher's Corner - Bruce, a question about... and read through the threads. There are a couple of optimizations from an excellent fellow named akosf. It helped my computer crunch.
RE: A few weeks back we had
)
For myself I'm very happy with using akosf's optimized client (see earlier post). Even though I may have a higher "requested credit", overall I've a better result/time than before. But what it really comes down to for me is getting the work down faster so to go on to the next round (S5). I'm not too concerned with credit standings.
RE: ... For myself I'm
)
Akosf's product is an optimized Einstein app, rather than a client, and does very well indeed at accelerating the processing, with no effect on credit claimed/processing time. An optimized client, on the other hand, has no effect on processing time for any BOINC project, but increases benchmarks figures so that claimed credit/processing time increases for all BOINC projects, across the board.
microcraft
"The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice" - MLK
RE: RE: ... For myself
)
First off I appologize (to Grand Rapids Radio Observatory) that I said client when I meant application but I do see a markedly reduced processing time than before when I compare past results (approx. sized wu's). Thus increased output ... all in all oops.